Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Minimum experience requirement per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO independently found — beyond the Director's analysis — that the Beneficiary did not establish the required 12 months of qualifying experience. The only corroborating employer letter covered approximately four months of experience, and the remaining experience was supported only by uncorroborated self-serving affidavits from the Beneficiary.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO independently found — beyond the Director's analysis — that the Beneficiary did not establish the required 12 months of qualifying experience. The only corroborating employer letter covered approximately four months of experience, and the remaining experience was supported only by uncorroborated self-serving affidavits from the Beneficiary. The Petitioner also did not establish that the required employer letters were unavailable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B5203; source_row=21490 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience / degree conferral date
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that the provisional certificate, issued July 29, 2004, constitutes the official academic record evidencing degree conferral because it certified the Beneficiary had passed all final examinations and was found qualified for the degree. Counting from that date, the Beneficiary accumulated over five years of qualifying progressive experience before the September 4, 2015 priority date.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the provisional certificate, issued July 29, 2004, constitutes the official academic record evidencing degree conferral because it certified the Beneficiary had passed all final examinations and was found qualified for the degree. Counting from that date, the Beneficiary accumulated over five years of qualifying progressive experience before the September 4, 2015 priority date. AACRAO EDGE confirmed that Indian provisional degree certificates are comparable to U.S. transcripts with degree statements certifying completion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-15_01_B5203; source_row=21481 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
Without additional information or evidence in response to the RFE, AAO found the Petitioner had not established that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Without additional information or evidence in response to the RFE, AAO found the Petitioner had not established that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-14_02_B5203; source_row=21479 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that, on the existing record and without an RFE response, the Petitioner had not shown that, on balance, a waiver would benefit the United States.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that, on the existing record and without an RFE response, the Petitioner had not shown that, on balance, a waiver would benefit the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-14_02_B5203; source_row=21480 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record did not show that the benefits of his planning and design work would extend beyond his firm and its projects to a level demonstrating national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record did not show that the benefits of his planning and design work would extend beyond his firm and its projects to a level demonstrating national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-14_02_B5203; source_row=21478 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the Petitioner's work has substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance because its impact did not extend beyond his single employer and its SAP projects did not stand to affect the broader IT field, petroleum industry, or U.S. economy.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Petitioner's work has substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance because its impact did not extend beyond his single employer and its SAP projects did not stand to affect the broader IT field, petroleum industry, or U.S. economy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-14_01_B5203; source_row=21475 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his contributions outweigh the inherent benefits of the labor certification process, that there is an urgent national interest in his proposed work, or that his contributions would benefit the nation even if other qualified U.S. workers were available.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his contributions outweigh the inherent benefits of the labor certification process, that there is an urgent national interest in his proposed work, or that his contributions would benefit the nation even if other qualified U.S. workers were available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-14_01_B5203; source_row=21477 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found the Petitioner's demonstrated past experience as a SAP project manager, including leading significant milestones and implementing improvements at his employer, showed he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Petitioner's demonstrated past experience as a SAP project manager, including leading significant milestones and implementing improvements at his employer, showed he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-14_01_B5203; source_row=21476 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
As of the date of the decision, the Petitioner had not provided evidence of membership in a qualifying association, and eligibility must be established from the time of filing through adjudication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
As of the date of the decision, the Petitioner had not provided evidence of membership in a qualifying association, and eligibility must be established from the time of filing through adjudication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-13_01_B2203; source_row=21464 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other25 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
Citation counts were modest and articles were used only as background references; conference proceedings had minimal citations; patents demonstrate originality but not major significance; recommendation letters spoke largely in terms of future potential rather than demonstrated impact; and letters were primarily conclusory.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Citation counts were modest and articles were used only as background references; conference proceedings had minimal citations; patents demonstrate originality but not major significance; recommendation letters spoke largely in terms of future potential rather than demonstrated impact; and letters were primarily conclusory.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-13_01_B2203; source_row=21467 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c