Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not establish how personal donations and involvement with charitable organizations relate to her field of comedic acting or demonstrate influence on the field at the level of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not establish how personal donations and involvement with charitable organizations relate to her field of comedic acting or demonstrate influence on the field at the level of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=21456 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner performed in a brief supporting role; her music video appearance did not constitute a leading or critical role for the band; and the television pilot role was prospective and undetailed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner performed in a brief supporting role; her music video appearance did not constitute a leading or critical role for the band; and the television pilot role was prospective and undetailed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=21458 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence of recommending comics and advising on a TV channel name did not constitute formal judging. The invitation to judge a film awards event post-dated the petition filing and no evidence showed she actually participated.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The evidence of recommending comics and advising on a TV channel name did not constitute formal judging. The invitation to judge a film awards event post-dated the petition filing and no evidence showed she actually participated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=21455 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not provide cumulative annual wage evidence and did not show how short-term contract payments represent significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide cumulative annual wage evidence and did not show how short-term contract payments represent significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=21459 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
SAG-AFTRA is based on working under a union-based contract rather than outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner did not show the national board consists of recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
SAG-AFTRA is based on working under a union-based contract rather than outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner did not show the national board consists of recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=21453 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
Although the Petitioner did not claim this criterion, AAO sua sponte found that the record showed she displayed her work on stage at artistic events, including a show in California.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner did not claim this criterion, AAO sua sponte found that the record showed she displayed her work on stage at artistic events, including a show in California.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=21457 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the sole relevant article lacked an author as required by the regulation, the 30,000 readership in Southern California was not shown to constitute a major medium, and other articles in the record did not pertain to the Petitioner individually.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the sole relevant article lacked an author as required by the regulation, the 30,000 readership in Southern California was not shown to constitute a major medium, and other articles in the record did not pertain to the Petitioner individually.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=21454 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Schedule A, Group I notice of posting requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found multiple deficiencies: failure to identify the employer, failure to specify the physical location of intended employment (multiple client worksites in various NY locations), failure to post at the actual worksites where the Beneficiary would provide services, and failure to provide an attestation about in-house media in light of the recruitment section of the Petitioner's website.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found multiple deficiencies: failure to identify the employer, failure to specify the physical location of intended employment (multiple client worksites in various NY locations), failure to post at the actual worksites where the Beneficiary would provide services, and failure to provide an attestation about in-house media in light of the recruitment section of the Petitioner's website.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-12_01_B5203; source_row=21462 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPostdoctoral ResearcherPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the petitioner well positioned based on his notable experience attracting considerable interest in cardiovascular disease research, his past success in influential original research, extensive citation record (426 total citations at filing, many articles in top 10% by year), and testimony from independent experts who adopted his methods and protocols.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner well positioned based on his notable experience attracting considerable interest in cardiovascular disease research, his past success in influential original research, extensive citation record (426 total citations at filing, many articles in top 10% by year), and testimony from independent experts who adopted his methods and protocols.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-07_01_B5203; source_row=21450 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c