Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 16941–16950

EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Director and AAO both found this criterion satisfied based on the Petitioner's authorship of numerous manuscripts in professional publications.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The Director and AAO both found this criterion satisfied based on the Petitioner's authorship of numerous manuscripts in professional publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_01_B2203; source_row=21417
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record contains evidence of the Petitioner's review of articles for professional journals, satisfying the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The record contains evidence of the Petitioner's review of articles for professional journals, satisfying the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_01_B2203; source_row=21415
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Petitioner's substantial peer review activity, prolific publication record including articles in a highly ranked journal, unusually high citation counts continuing post-appeal, and expert letters attesting to her international reputation collectively demonstrate extraordinary ability and sustained acclaim at the very top of her field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's substantial peer review activity, prolific publication record including articles in a highly ranked journal, unusually high citation counts continuing post-appeal, and expert letters attesting to her international reputation collectively demonstrate extraordinary ability and sustained acclaim at the very top of her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_01_B2203; source_row=21418
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the criterion met based on extensive independent citations to the Petitioner's article and recommendation letters detailing its impact on the field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the criterion met based on extensive independent citations to the Petitioner's article and recommendation letters detailing its impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_01_B2203; source_row=21416
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWrecognitionNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / EnergyMaster’s

Issue evaluated

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record did not support the Petitioner's claims of nine billion dollars in energy services; corporate documents did not clearly link the Petitioner to the companies, and no letters or testimony from peers or governmental entities attested to his achievements or contributions.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record did not support the Petitioner's claims of nine billion dollars in energy services; corporate documents did not clearly link the Petitioner to the companies, and no letters or testimony from peers or governmental entities attested to his achievements or contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_02_B5203; source_row=21426
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWacademic recordNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / EnergyMaster’s

Issue evaluated

academic record

official academic record

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's own ETA Form 9089 indicated high school as his highest completed education, he had not completed his current enrollment, and he failed to document any other educational credential relating to his field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's own ETA Form 9089 indicated high school as his highest completed education, he had not completed his current enrollment, and he failed to document any other educational credential relating to his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_02_B5203; source_row=21421
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / EnergyMaster’s

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner submitted only a December 2015 job offer letter for a sales consultant position, which did not address his prior full-time experience in business.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted only a December 2015 job offer letter for a sales consultant position, which did not address his prior full-time experience in business.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_02_B5203; source_row=21422
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / EnergyMaster’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

What the decision said

AAO did not reach this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the underlying EB-2 classification, rendering the NIW analysis moot.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the underlying EB-2 classification, rendering the NIW analysis moot.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_02_B5203; source_row=21427
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date onward

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the related companies are legally distinct from the Petitioner, the Petitioner submitted none of its own required financial documentation, and multiple unexplained discrepancies regarding FEINs, names, and consolidated filings undermined the claims.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the related companies are legally distinct from the Petitioner, the Petitioner submitted none of its own required financial documentation, and multiple unexplained discrepancies regarding FEINs, names, and consolidated filings undermined the claims.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-25_01_B5203; source_row=21419
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIMaster’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Date of degree conferral / start of five-year post-baccalaureate experience clock

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO held that EB-2 regulations speak of 'degrees,' not diplomas, and that an 'official academic record' is not limited to a formal diploma. Applying a case-specific analysis, AAO found the provisional certificate—issued May 24, 2003 and stating the Beneficiary had completed all requirements and done all necessary for formal degree presentation—constituted conferral of the degree.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO held that EB-2 regulations speak of 'degrees,' not diplomas, and that an 'official academic record' is not limited to a formal diploma. Applying a case-specific analysis, AAO found the provisional certificate—issued May 24, 2003 and stating the Beneficiary had completed all requirements and done all necessary for formal degree presentation—constituted conferral of the degree. AACRAO EDGE confirmed that Indian provisional degree certificates are comparable to official U.S. academic transcripts with degree statements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-24_01_B5203; source_row=21414
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment