Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16971–16980
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's salary documentation contained inconsistent and conflicting figures, making it impossible to establish his actual salary or remuneration. Additionally, the comparative salary data the Petitioner submitted was for petroleum engineers generally, while the Petitioner held a managerial role and thus needed to compare his salary to other managers of petroleum engineers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's salary documentation contained inconsistent and conflicting figures, making it impossible to establish his actual salary or remuneration. Additionally, the comparative salary data the Petitioner submitted was for petroleum engineers generally, while the Petitioner held a managerial role and thus needed to compare his salary to other managers of petroleum engineers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-16_01_B2203; source_row=21386 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held that managerial personnel decisions (reviewing resumes, making promotion decisions) do not constitute serving as 'a judge' in the formal sense required by the regulation. The unpublished precedent cited by the Petitioner was non-binding and distinguishable because that petitioner also served on a prize selection committee and reviewed submissions for publication.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that managerial personnel decisions (reviewing resumes, making promotion decisions) do not constitute serving as 'a judge' in the formal sense required by the regulation. The unpublished precedent cited by the Petitioner was non-binding and distinguishable because that petitioner also served on a prize selection committee and reviewed submissions for publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-16_01_B2203; source_row=21383 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
Without a response to the RFE, the Petitioner did not provide additional information and evidence sufficient to show she is well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Without a response to the RFE, the Petitioner did not provide additional information and evidence sufficient to show she is well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-16_01_B5203; source_row=21389 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's classroom teaching had not been shown to impact the field of education or mathematics more broadly than her own students, and thus failed the national importance element.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's classroom teaching had not been shown to impact the field of education or mathematics more broadly than her own students, and thus failed the national importance element.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-16_01_B5203; source_row=21388 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
Without further evidence, the Petitioner did not establish that on balance, waiving the job offer requirement would be beneficial to the United States.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
Without further evidence, the Petitioner did not establish that on balance, waiving the job offer requirement would be beneficial to the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-16_01_B5203; source_row=21390 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three criteria at step one, but noted in passing that the aggregate record would not establish the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three criteria at step one, but noted in passing that the aggregate record would not establish the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-16_01_B2203; source_row=21387 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the letters established the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for his employer, that his successes added to the company's reputation, and the record included evidence of the company's distinguished reputation. Therefore this criterion was met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the letters established the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for his employer, that his successes added to the company's reputation, and the record included evidence of the company's distinguished reputation. Therefore this criterion was met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-16_01_B2203; source_row=21385 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherProfessor
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
Because the Petitioner failed to define a specific proposed endeavor, AAO could not determine whether he was well positioned to advance it. The record lacked concrete plans and progress documentation.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to define a specific proposed endeavor, AAO could not determine whether he was well positioned to advance it. The record lacked concrete plans and progress documentation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-15_01_B5203; source_row=21381 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherProfessor
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to establish that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements, given the absence of a clearly defined proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements, given the absence of a clearly defined proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-15_01_B5203; source_row=21382 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherProfessor
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's proposed endeavor was not sufficiently defined. He described multiple possible directions without specifying which one he intended to pursue or how his time would be divided, making it impossible to evaluate whether his work had substantial merit and national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's proposed endeavor was not sufficiently defined. He described multiple possible directions without specifying which one he intended to pursue or how his time would be divided, making it impossible to evaluate whether his work had substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-15_01_B5203; source_row=21380 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c