Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16981–16990
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot established
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Scholarly authorship
scholarly articles
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's submitted translations were insufficient to demonstrate the materials were scholarly, and the publication's status as major media was not objectively corroborated.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's submitted translations were insufficient to demonstrate the materials were scholarly, and the publication's status as major media was not objectively corroborated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21375 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the letters did not sufficiently confirm that the Petitioner actually judged the competition, did not elaborate on the duties of committee members, and did not establish that mentorship or board activities constituted judging the work of others.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the letters did not sufficiently confirm that the Petitioner actually judged the competition, did not elaborate on the duties of committee members, and did not establish that mentorship or board activities constituted judging the work of others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21376 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the totality of the record — two brief articles, inconclusive judging activities, undocumented impact of authored works, and minimal media coverage of the company — did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of the record — two brief articles, inconclusive judging activities, undocumented impact of authored works, and minimal media coverage of the company — did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21378 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree or equivalent (bachelor's plus five years post-baccalaureate progressive experience)
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the provisional certificate date (June 15, 2004) controls because the regulations reference 'degrees' not diplomas, and the record—including the provisional certificate, memoranda of marks, and a statement from the university's controller of examinations—demonstrated that all substantive degree requirements were completed and the degree approved by the university as of that date.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the provisional certificate date (June 15, 2004) controls because the regulations reference 'degrees' not diplomas, and the record—including the provisional certificate, memoranda of marks, and a statement from the university's controller of examinations—demonstrated that all substantive degree requirements were completed and the degree approved by the university as of that date. Using this date, the Beneficiary had over five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience by the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=21379 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record lacked documentation of the company's operations or reputation, no organizational chart confirming the Petitioner's hierarchical role, and that the university letter was conclusory without specific impact details and was dated after filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked documentation of the company's operations or reputation, no organizational chart confirming the Petitioner's hierarchical role, and that the university letter was conclusory without specific impact details and was dated after filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=21377 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a record of success or progress in his field or sufficient interest from relevant parties. His dissertation was viewed only 113 times with no evidence of significance, his publications lacked meaningful citation evidence, and his prior software work for cancer researchers was unrelated to his stated infrastructure research goals.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a record of success or progress in his field or sufficient interest from relevant parties. His dissertation was viewed only 113 times with no evidence of significance, his publications lacked meaningful citation evidence, and his prior software work for cancer researchers was unrelated to his stated infrastructure research goals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B5203; source_row=21372 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner's qualifications may exceed minimum job requirements, he failed to show an urgent national interest in his specific efforts or contributions of sufficient value to benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available, and thus did not demonstrate the balance tips in favor of waiving labor certification.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's qualifications may exceed minimum job requirements, he failed to show an urgent national interest in his specific efforts or contributions of sufficient value to benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available, and thus did not demonstrate the balance tips in favor of waiving labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B5203; source_row=21373 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's single qualifying award targeted young actors, his media coverage lacked recency, his performance roles did not distinguish him from other actors, and the commercial success evidence was insufficient, collectively failing to establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's single qualifying award targeted young actors, his media coverage lacked recency, his performance roles did not distinguish him from other actors, and the commercial success evidence was insufficient, collectively failing to establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B2203; source_row=21370 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted the criterion requires volume of sales or box office receipts and that the Petitioner failed to explain how his involvement in shows available on streaming platforms contributed to the overall popularity and success of those companies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the criterion requires volume of sales or box office receipts and that the Petitioner failed to explain how his involvement in shows available on streaming platforms contributed to the overall popularity and success of those companies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-11_01_B2203; source_row=21369 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c