Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17011–17020
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the totality of the evidence demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim, citing the Petitioner's high citation rates, the influence of his statistical methodology, and the broad impact of his osteoporosis study on health recommendations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of the evidence demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim, citing the Petitioner's high citation rates, the influence of his statistical methodology, and the broad impact of his osteoporosis study on health recommendations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=21350 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Regardless of whether the Beneficiary was actually paid the proffered wage, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2) expressly requires submission of at least one of three document types (annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements). The Yates Memorandum itself requires submission of at least one of these required documents as initial evidence.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Regardless of whether the Beneficiary was actually paid the proffered wage, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2) expressly requires submission of at least one of three document types (annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements). The Yates Memorandum itself requires submission of at least one of these required documents as initial evidence. Without them, there is insufficient information to conclude the Petitioner has continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-05_04_B5203; source_row=21359 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not show his licenses, memberships, or recognition reflect expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered among ministers and community developers; recommendation letters offered general praise without distinguishing him from others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not show his licenses, memberships, or recognition reflect expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered among ministers and community developers; recommendation letters offered general praise without distinguishing him from others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-05_01_B5203; source_row=21351 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer/labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not establish that, on balance, waiving the job offer and labor certification requirements would benefit the United States.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not establish that, on balance, waiving the job offer and labor certification requirements would benefit the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-04_01_B5203; source_row=21346 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO could not determine substantial merit and national importance because the Petitioner failed to clearly articulate a specific proposed endeavor, identifying only a generic intent to work as a chemical engineer in various industries.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO could not determine substantial merit and national importance because the Petitioner failed to clearly articulate a specific proposed endeavor, identifying only a generic intent to work as a chemical engineer in various industries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-04_01_B5203; source_row=21344 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the evidence did not show a record of success, progress, or interest from relevant parties sufficient to render the Petitioner well positioned to advance an endeavor; his undergraduate research had not been shown to be widely utilized or independently cited.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence did not show a record of success, progress, or interest from relevant parties sufficient to render the Petitioner well positioned to advance an endeavor; his undergraduate research had not been shown to be widely utilized or independently cited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-04_01_B5203; source_row=21345 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters do not identify contributions qualifying as original contributions of major significance in the field as a whole; a contribution to a university orchestra does not rise to that level, and the letters show admiration for talent without demonstrating field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters do not identify contributions qualifying as original contributions of major significance in the field as a whole; a contribution to a university orchestra does not rise to that level, and the letters show admiration for talent without demonstrating field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21336 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The jury reports do not name the Petitioner, the record does not show he played in or was affiliated with the competition, and there is insufficient detail to establish the award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The jury reports do not name the Petitioner, the record does not show he played in or was affiliated with the competition, and there is insufficient detail to establish the award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21333 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner offered no box office receipts or sales materials, and failed to show that the commercial success criterion is not readily applicable to his field; participation in orchestras is demonstrable through box office results and ticket sales, so the criterion directly applies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner offered no box office receipts or sales materials, and failed to show that the commercial success criterion is not readily applicable to his field; participation in orchestras is demonstrable through box office results and ticket sales, so the criterion directly applies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21339 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to provide copies of the original foreign-language press releases, did not demonstrate that the sources are professional or major trade publications or major media, and did not include the date and author for each piece.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to provide copies of the original foreign-language press releases, did not demonstrate that the sources are professional or major trade publications or major media, and did not include the date and author for each piece.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21334 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c