Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17021–17030
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacks documentation establishing the orchestra as an organization with a distinguished reputation, and the Petitioner's own appellate statement contradicted earlier evidence about who led the organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacks documentation establishing the orchestra as an organization with a distinguished reputation, and the Petitioner's own appellate statement contradicted earlier evidence about who led the organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21338 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Reference letters made conclusory claims but did not sufficiently explain how the Petitioner's roles were leading or critical or how his performances drove team success. Repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Reference letters made conclusory claims but did not sufficiently explain how the Petitioner's roles were leading or critical or how his performances drove team success. Repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=21343 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Adjudicator's Field Manual emphasizes the exhibitions or showcases must be artistic in nature, and the Petitioner pointed to no legal authority establishing that soccer matches are artistic.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Adjudicator's Field Manual emphasizes the exhibitions or showcases must be artistic in nature, and the Petitioner pointed to no legal authority establishing that soccer matches are artistic.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=21342 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner
Why AAO was not persuaded
The articles discussed soccer matches and teams rather than the Petitioner himself, mentioning him only briefly without biographical or competitive history. He also failed to establish that the magazine qualifies as major media or a major trade publication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles discussed soccer matches and teams rather than the Petitioner himself, mentioning him only briefly without biographical or competitive history. He also failed to establish that the magazine qualifies as major media or a major trade publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_02_B2203; source_row=21341 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the requisite level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=21340 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO finds petitioner has not demonstrated a record of success or progress, citation impact, or interest from relevant parties sufficient to show she is well positioned to advance her ASD research endeavor. Much of the evidence (publications, presentations, peer review invitations, advisory work, teaching assistantships) post-dates the filing date and cannot establish eligibility at filing.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds petitioner has not demonstrated a record of success or progress, citation impact, or interest from relevant parties sufficient to show she is well positioned to advance her ASD research endeavor. Much of the evidence (publications, presentations, peer review invitations, advisory work, teaching assistantships) post-dates the filing date and cannot establish eligibility at filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-02_01_B5203; source_row=21331 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer/labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes petitioner has not shown an urgent national interest in her own efforts or that her contributions would benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available; her shortage-of-qualified-workers argument actually undermines the claim that obtaining a labor certification would be impractical.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes petitioner has not shown an urgent national interest in her own efforts or that her contributions would benefit the nation even if qualified U.S. workers were available; her shortage-of-qualified-workers argument actually undermines the claim that obtaining a labor certification would be impractical.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-02_01_B5203; source_row=21332 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO finds petitioner's proposed ASD-related work has substantial merit. While teaching activities lack documented broader impact and do not meet national importance, her proposed ASD education research is of national importance because results are disseminated through journals and conferences.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds petitioner's proposed ASD-related work has substantial merit. While teaching activities lack documented broader impact and do not meet national importance, her proposed ASD education research is of national importance because results are disseminated through journals and conferences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-02_01_B5203; source_row=21330 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c