Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO held that a case-specific analysis is required to determine whether an official academic record shows completion of all degree requirements and university approval of the degree. The provisional certificate and marks memorandum established that all requirements were met as of May 18, 2008, making all subsequent experience post-baccalaureate and satisfying the five-year requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that a case-specific analysis is required to determine whether an official academic record shows completion of all degree requirements and university approval of the degree. The provisional certificate and marks memorandum established that all requirements were met as of May 18, 2008, making all subsequent experience post-baccalaureate and satisfying the five-year requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-05-01_01_B5203; source_row=21329 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets specific skills requirements of labor certification (H.14)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO raised an additional basis for denial sua sponte: the record does not establish that the Beneficiary possessed the required specific skills (MS Office, SQL, C, JD Edwards, Access, Front Page) prior to employment with the Petitioner, and his experience in the offered position cannot be used to satisfy these requirements per 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO raised an additional basis for denial sua sponte: the record does not establish that the Beneficiary possessed the required specific skills (MS Office, SQL, C, JD Edwards, Access, Front Page) prior to employment with the Petitioner, and his experience in the offered position cannot be used to satisfy these requirements per 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-27_03_B5203; source_row=21328 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets educational requirements of labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed that a degree from an unaccredited institution does not provide sufficient assurance of quality to satisfy a labor certification requirement for a master's degree, and rejected the argument that ICE enrollment approval for foreign students bears on this determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that a degree from an unaccredited institution does not provide sufficient assurance of quality to satisfy a labor certification requirement for a master's degree, and rejected the argument that ICE enrollment approval for foreign students bears on this determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-27_03_B5203; source_row=21327 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of post-baccalaureate qualifying experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
Only experience after October 13, 2009 (the date the diploma was awarded) counts as post-baccalaureate, and the single employer letter documents only about four years of such experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Only experience after October 13, 2009 (the date the diploma was awarded) counts as post-baccalaureate, and the single employer letter documents only about four years of such experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=21324 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held the post graduate diploma alone equates to a U.S. bachelor's degree without combining lesser credentials, and the record actually documents the Beneficiary's completion of multiple computer-related undergraduate courses.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the post graduate diploma alone equates to a U.S. bachelor's degree without combining lesser credentials, and the record actually documents the Beneficiary's completion of multiple computer-related undergraduate courses.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=21323 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ability to pay proffered wage from priority date onward
Why AAO was not persuaded
Net income of $72,293 (correctly read from Schedule K, not $82,346 as Petitioner claimed) is below the $91,586 wage shortfall; net current assets are negative; prorating is not supported by the evidence; bank statements alone do not establish sustainable ability to pay; and 2016 audited financials are from a year after the priority date and do not cure the lack of documentation about the wages owed to other sponsored benefi…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Net income of $72,293 (correctly read from Schedule K, not $82,346 as Petitioner claimed) is below the $91,586 wage shortfall; net current assets are negative; prorating is not supported by the evidence; bank statements alone do not establish sustainable ability to pay; and 2016 audited financials are from a year after the priority date and do not cure the lack of documentation about the wages owed to other sponsored beneficiaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-27_02_B5203; source_row=21326 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO did not conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not show the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not show the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_03_B2203; source_row=21319 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to establish that the sources were professional or major trade publications or other major media, most articles lacked required title, date, and author information, and the articles were about community projects rather than about the Beneficiary himself.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish that the sources were professional or major trade publications or other major media, most articles lacked required title, date, and author information, and the articles were about community projects rather than about the Beneficiary himself.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_03_B2203; source_row=21316 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The awards from the local Nigerian district organization were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. Additionally, some awards were conferred on the local club rather than the Beneficiary personally, and the Petitioner did not establish they should be attributed to him personally.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The awards from the local Nigerian district organization were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. Additionally, some awards were conferred on the local club rather than the Beneficiary personally, and the Petitioner did not establish they should be attributed to him personally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_03_B2203; source_row=21314 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c