Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17051–17060

NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

bachelor's degree required by labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO disagrees with the Director, holding that the U.S. MBA in an accepted field exceeds the labor certification's bachelor's-degree requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagrees with the Director, holding that the U.S. MBA in an accepted field exceeds the labor certification's bachelor's-degree requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_01_B5203; source_row=21306
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO declines to credit the company letters due to inconsistencies and deficiencies, notes that parent-company assets cannot be considered, and finds the absence of annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements fatal to the ability-to-pay showing despite the 2015 wage payments.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declines to credit the company letters due to inconsistencies and deficiencies, notes that parent-company assets cannot be considered, and finds the absence of annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements fatal to the ability-to-pay showing despite the 2015 wage payments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_01_B5203; source_row=21308
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO finds that because the qualifying credential is the June 15, 2008 MBA, none of the documented experience post-dates that credential, and the experience letters conflict with each other and with the labor certification on titles and dates.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO finds that because the qualifying credential is the June 15, 2008 MBA, none of the documented experience post-dates that credential, and the experience letters conflict with each other and with the labor certification on titles and dates.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_01_B5203; source_row=21307
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why the evidence was persuasive

With the additional evidence submitted on appeal, AAO determined the Petitioner demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
With the additional evidence submitted on appeal, AAO determined the Petitioner demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_03_B5203; source_row=21320
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets labor certification experience requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification requires six months of software engineer experience; the Beneficiary's experience with the Petitioner was explicitly stated as non-qualifying, and the only other listed experience appeared to be an internship during the master's program with no corroborating employer letter. AAO remanded for further consideration and issuance of an RFE.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification requires six months of software engineer experience; the Beneficiary's experience with the Petitioner was explicitly stated as non-qualifying, and the only other listed experience appeared to be an internship during the master's program with no corroborating employer letter. AAO remanded for further consideration and issuance of an RFE.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_03_B5203; source_row=21321
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Petitioner met this criterion because he authored articles published in professional journals.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner met this criterion because he authored articles published in professional journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-26_01_B2203; source_row=21302
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Bank statements and personnel records (paystubs) as ability-to-pay evidence

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that bank statements cannot substitute for the three enumerated evidence types (annual reports, tax returns, audited financial statements). Current assets in bank accounts must be offset by liabilities, which cannot be determined without the required documents. Paystubs showing payment of debtor-in-possession wages do not establish ability to pay and do not clarify whether they belong to the Petitioner or its parent.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that bank statements cannot substitute for the three enumerated evidence types (annual reports, tax returns, audited financial statements). Current assets in bank accounts must be offset by liabilities, which cannot be determined without the required documents. Paystubs showing payment of debtor-in-possession wages do not establish ability to pay and do not clarify whether they belong to the Petitioner or its parent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-21_01_B5203; source_row=21299
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Parent/related entity assets as ability-to-pay evidence

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the petitioning entity is legally distinct from its owner, operates under a different FEIN, and that the assets of owners or unrelated entities cannot be considered in determining the Petitioner's ability to pay. The consolidated balance sheets also did not identify finances by FEIN and were unaudited.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioning entity is legally distinct from its owner, operates under a different FEIN, and that the assets of owners or unrelated entities cannot be considered in determining the Petitioner's ability to pay. The consolidated balance sheets also did not identify finances by FEIN and were unaudited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-21_01_B5203; source_row=21298
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

CFO attestation as ability-to-pay evidence

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the CFO's statement appeared to describe the parent company's finances, not the petitioning entity's, and lacked identifying information (such as the petitioner's FEIN) linking it to the actual petitioner. The declaration therefore could not be accepted in lieu of the required documents.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the CFO's statement appeared to describe the parent company's finances, not the petitioning entity's, and lacked identifying information (such as the petitioner's FEIN) linking it to the actual petitioner. The declaration therefore could not be accepted in lieu of the required documents.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-21_01_B5203; source_row=21300
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Sonegawa totality of circumstances - ability to pay

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the evidence insufficient to show sustained profitability (gross income actually declined after 2010, software-generated reports lacked supporting financial data), the cash-on-hand claim was undocumented, and the expectation-of-increased-profits claim was unsupported by business plans, marketing budgets, or documentation of accreditations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence insufficient to show sustained profitability (gross income actually declined after 2010, software-generated reports lacked supporting financial data), the cash-on-hand claim was undocumented, and the expectation-of-increased-profits claim was unsupported by business plans, marketing budgets, or documentation of accreditations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-20_01_B5203; source_row=21295
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment