Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Advanced degree or equivalent (bachelor's plus five years post-baccalaureate progressive experience)
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that EB-2 regulations speak in terms of 'degrees' not diplomas, and that an 'official academic record' showing a degree is not limited to a formal diploma. A case-specific analysis showed the provisional certificate evidenced completion of all substantive requirements and university approval of the degree, consistent with AACRAO EDGE guidance on Indian provisional degree certificates.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that EB-2 regulations speak in terms of 'degrees' not diplomas, and that an 'official academic record' showing a degree is not limited to a formal diploma. A case-specific analysis showed the provisional certificate evidenced completion of all substantive requirements and university approval of the degree, consistent with AACRAO EDGE guidance on Indian provisional degree certificates. Measuring from the provisional certificate date of February 20, 2005, the Beneficiary accrued well over five years of qualifying experience before the June 24, 2014 priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-20_02_B5203; source_row=21297 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
date of conferral of foreign equivalent bachelor's degree for measuring post-baccalaureate experience
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that the regulation references "degrees," not diplomas, and that an official academic record is not limited to a formal diploma. The provisional certificate combined with the statement of marks demonstrated completion of all substantive requirements and university approval as of May 27, 2007, supported by AACRAO EDGE's description of Indian provisional degree certificates.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the regulation references "degrees," not diplomas, and that an official academic record is not limited to a formal diploma. The provisional certificate combined with the statement of marks demonstrated completion of all substantive requirements and university approval as of May 27, 2007, supported by AACRAO EDGE's description of Indian provisional degree certificates.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-19_01_B5203; source_row=21294 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The only documented wages were three pay stubs from early 2016, postdating the June 2015 priority date, so the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary commanded the salary before the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The only documented wages were three pay stubs from early 2016, postdating the June 2015 priority date, so the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary commanded the salary before the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-18_01_B5203; source_row=21291 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Director accepted reference letters and reviews of the café as showing recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry, and AAO did not disturb that finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Director accepted reference letters and reviews of the café as showing recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry, and AAO did not disturb that finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-18_01_B5203; source_row=21292 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
Why AAO was not persuaded
The documented experience amounted to six years with a prior employer plus 20 months with the Petitioner as of the June 2015 priority date, totaling less than 10 years. The contract for a period of employment did not substitute for the required employer letter confirming dates of work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The documented experience amounted to six years with a prior employer plus 20 months with the Petitioner as of the June 2015 priority date, totaling less than 10 years. The contract for a period of employment did not substitute for the required employer letter confirming dates of work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-18_01_B5203; source_row=21290 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The ETA Form 9089 required only a high school diploma, no training, five years of experience, and offered the prevailing wage — none of which denote a position requiring exceptional ability. The Petitioner waived this issue by failing to address it on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The ETA Form 9089 required only a high school diploma, no training, five years of experience, and offered the prevailing wage — none of which denote a position requiring exceptional ability. The Petitioner waived this issue by failing to address it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-18_01_B5203; source_row=21293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Director applied the wrong EDGE entry. The correct EDGE entry for the second-cycle magister, which requires a prior licencjat degree, equates the credential to a U.S. master's degree. Because the Beneficiary's magister followed a three-year licencjata and lasted two and a half years, it falls under the second-cycle category and is equivalent to a U.S. master's degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director applied the wrong EDGE entry. The correct EDGE entry for the second-cycle magister, which requires a prior licencjat degree, equates the credential to a U.S. master's degree. Because the Beneficiary's magister followed a three-year licencjata and lasted two and a half years, it falls under the second-cycle category and is equivalent to a U.S. master's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=21287 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Required experience (12 months as marketing specialist)
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Director did not address this issue, AAO found that the submitted employer letter failed to describe the Beneficiary's duties as a marketing specialist as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3), and thus did not establish the required 12 months of experience. The matter was remanded for the Director to address this deficiency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Director did not address this issue, AAO found that the submitted employer letter failed to describe the Beneficiary's duties as a marketing specialist as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3), and thus did not establish the required 12 months of experience. The matter was remanded for the Director to address this deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=21288 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO acknowledges some of Petitioner's knowledge may exceed minimum occupational requirements but finds she has not shown urgent national interest or benefits sufficient to outweigh the labor certification process.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledges some of Petitioner's knowledge may exceed minimum occupational requirements but finds she has not shown urgent national interest or benefits sufficient to outweigh the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-04-14_01_B5203; source_row=21284 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c