Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The Beneficiary was paid $138,788.93 in 2015, below the $150,000 minimum. Net income and net current assets were both negative. Equity funding did not cure the actual shortfall. The 2014 payment predated the priority date, and 2016 payroll records are not regulatory-required evidence. Sonegawa factors did not help given the Petitioner's consistent unprofitability and going-concern doubt.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary was paid $138,788.93 in 2015, below the $150,000 minimum. Net income and net current assets were both negative. Equity funding did not cure the actual shortfall. The 2014 payment predated the priority date, and 2016 payroll records are not regulatory-required evidence. Sonegawa factors did not help given the Petitioner's consistent unprofitability and going-concern doubt.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-10_01_B5203; source_row=21180 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO analyzed all Modular Container factors and found several weighed against bona fides: the Beneficiary's role as president spanning 2010–2015, managerial CTO duties, ownership interest potentially up to 9.2%, specialized job requirements, and small workforce. Unresolved inconsistencies about presidential role and lack of recruitment documentation also undermined bona fides.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO analyzed all Modular Container factors and found several weighed against bona fides: the Beneficiary's role as president spanning 2010–2015, managerial CTO duties, ownership interest potentially up to 9.2%, specialized job requirements, and small workforce. Unresolved inconsistencies about presidential role and lack of recruitment documentation also undermined bona fides.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-10_01_B5203; source_row=21181 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the H.14 'in lieu of' language exceeds standard Kellogg language and creates an undefined minimum that could fall below a master's degree or its regulatory equivalent. Without recruitment documentation to clarify intent, the labor certification cannot support advanced degree professional classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the H.14 'in lieu of' language exceeds standard Kellogg language and creates an undefined minimum that could fall below a master's degree or its regulatory equivalent. Without recruitment documentation to clarify intent, the labor certification cannot support advanced degree professional classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-10_02_B5203; source_row=21183 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that W-2 Forms showing actual payment of the full proffered wage in 2014 and 2015, together with documented wages and net current assets in 2013, established ability to pay for this Beneficiary and all other sponsored I-140 beneficiaries.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that W-2 Forms showing actual payment of the full proffered wage in 2014 and 2015, together with documented wages and net current assets in 2013, established ability to pay for this Beneficiary and all other sponsored I-140 beneficiaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_02_B5203; source_row=21177 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all education, training, and experience required by the labor certification as of the priority date of November 27, 2013.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all education, training, and experience required by the labor certification as of the priority date of November 27, 2013.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_02_B5203; source_row=21178 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all required education, training, and experience specified in the labor certification as of the priority date of May 10, 2013.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Beneficiary possessed all required education, training, and experience specified in the labor certification as of the priority date of May 10, 2013.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_01_B5203; source_row=21176 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner's submission of required documentary evidence, actual wage payments in 2015, and net current assets in 2013–2014 demonstrated ability to pay the proffered wage across all relevant years.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's submission of required documentary evidence, actual wage payments in 2015, and net current assets in 2013–2014 demonstrated ability to pay the proffered wage across all relevant years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_01_B5203; source_row=21175 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary holds qualifying degree per labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO reviewed the full record including appeal evidence and determined the Beneficiary holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in economics, satisfying the labor certification's sole educational requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the full record including appeal evidence and determined the Beneficiary holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in economics, satisfying the labor certification's sole educational requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-09_03_B5203; source_row=21179 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other2,005 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis since the Petitioner failed step 1, but noted that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis since the Petitioner failed step 1, but noted that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_01_B2203; source_row=21165 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The documentation submitted was insufficient to demonstrate that the award is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in fashion design. The rector's letter did not comment about the award, the article only mentioned it in passing without discussing its significance, and the online profile of another designer referencing the award did not establish its national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The documentation submitted was insufficient to demonstrate that the award is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in fashion design. The rector's letter did not comment about the award, the article only mentioned it in passing without discussing its significance, and the online profile of another designer referencing the award did not establish its national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_01_B2203; source_row=21159 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c