Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Net income sufficient to cover proffered wage deficiencies
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's net income of $230,258 in 2012 and $283,300 in 2013 fell far short of the total wage deficiencies of $847,731.21 and $486,471.74 respectively. AAO rejected adding back software costs or rent payments, as the Petitioner failed to demonstrate these were unusual expenses or that the corporate entity could be conflated with its shareholders.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's net income of $230,258 in 2012 and $283,300 in 2013 fell far short of the total wage deficiencies of $847,731.21 and $486,471.74 respectively. AAO rejected adding back software costs or rent payments, as the Petitioner failed to demonstrate these were unusual expenses or that the corporate entity could be conflated with its shareholders.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=21167 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Despite acknowledging positive business growth, AAO found the history of large wage deficiencies from 2010 through 2012 relative to net income and net current assets outweighed the positive factors. Software costs were not unusual or one-time given the Petitioner's industry, and 2014 improvements could not retroactively establish ability to pay as of the 2012 priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Despite acknowledging positive business growth, AAO found the history of large wage deficiencies from 2010 through 2012 relative to net income and net current assets outweighed the positive factors. Software costs were not unusual or one-time given the Petitioner's industry, and 2014 improvements could not retroactively establish ability to pay as of the 2012 priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=21169 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence shows wage deficiencies for the Beneficiary in 2012 ($35,205.52), 2013 ($21,662), and 2014 ($645), and 32 other I-140 beneficiaries were also paid below their proffered wages in those years.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence shows wage deficiencies for the Beneficiary in 2012 ($35,205.52), 2013 ($21,662), and 2014 ($645), and 32 other I-140 beneficiaries were also paid below their proffered wages in those years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=21166 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO independently found insufficient net income and net current assets in 2011 and 2012 to cover the aggregate wage deficiencies of all I-140 beneficiaries; rejected accountant's GAAP/software-cost theory, the rent add-back theory, and reliance on bank balances; found Sonegawa totality factors do not overcome the persistent shortfalls.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO independently found insufficient net income and net current assets in 2011 and 2012 to cover the aggregate wage deficiencies of all I-140 beneficiaries; rejected accountant's GAAP/software-cost theory, the rent add-back theory, and reliance on bank balances; found Sonegawa totality factors do not overcome the persistent shortfalls.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-08_02_B5203; source_row=21170 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that although the competition is restricted to overseas participants, the Petitioner did not establish that the prize is recognized outside of China as a major award, and did not present evidence that the competition or prize is widely reported compared to other globally recognized awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that although the competition is restricted to overseas participants, the Petitioner did not establish that the prize is recognized outside of China as a major award, and did not present evidence that the competition or prize is widely reported compared to other globally recognized awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-07_01_B2203; source_row=21153 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that video clips do not constitute written or published material under the plain language of the criterion, the promotional video and press releases are about a product rather than the Petitioner, and the biographic page lacks the required title, date, and author information.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that video clips do not constitute written or published material under the plain language of the criterion, the promotional video and press releases are about a product rather than the Petitioner, and the biographic page lacks the required title, date, and author information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-07_01_B2203; source_row=21155 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI23 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that user statistics were not shown to be comparatively significant, citation evidence showed the article was used only as background information, press releases were promotional rather than independent coverage, conference presentations lacked evidence of significant impact, and reference letters were conclusory statements that failed to show how the contributions impacted the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that user statistics were not shown to be comparatively significant, citation evidence showed the article was used only as background information, press releases were promotional rather than independent coverage, conference presentations lacked evidence of significant impact, and reference letters were conclusory statements that failed to show how the contributions impacted the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-07_01_B2203; source_row=21156 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI23 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of at least three evidentiary criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of at least three evidentiary criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-07_01_B2203; source_row=21158 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner's prize is nationally recognized for excellence, and therefore he meets this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner's prize is nationally recognized for excellence, and therefore he meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-03-07_01_B2203; source_row=21154 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c