Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Photographs of individuals wearing the Petitioner's jewelry do not constitute published material about the Petitioner relating to her work, as required by the plain language of the criterion. The Petitioner also failed to demonstrate that published material does not readily apply to jewelry designers or that photographs are comparable to published material about her in professional or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Photographs of individuals wearing the Petitioner's jewelry do not constitute published material about the Petitioner relating to her work, as required by the plain language of the criterion. The Petitioner also failed to demonstrate that published material does not readily apply to jewelry designers or that photographs are comparable to published material about her in professional or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-30_01_B2203; source_row=21072 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's W-2 payments to the Beneficiary fell short of the proffered wage; the parent's consolidated tax return showed negative net income and net current assets; the Petitioner's financial statements were unaudited and therefore not reliable evidence under the regulation; the separately prepared unfiled 2014 tax return was inconsistent in accounting basis with the parent's return, unsigned, and prepared post-denial…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's W-2 payments to the Beneficiary fell short of the proffered wage; the parent's consolidated tax return showed negative net income and net current assets; the Petitioner's financial statements were unaudited and therefore not reliable evidence under the regulation; the separately prepared unfiled 2014 tax return was inconsistent in accounting basis with the parent's return, unsigned, and prepared post-denial; bank statements are not enumerated evidence; and Sonegawa factors did not overcome these deficiencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-30_02_B5203; source_row=21078 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date onward
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director, finding the record lacked required evidence (annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements) for 2015 onward and the Petitioner submitted nothing additional on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director, finding the record lacked required evidence (annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements) for 2015 onward and the Petitioner submitted nothing additional on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-30_01_B5203; source_row=21076 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
denial without RFE/NOID and due process
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO conceded the record did not contain clear evidence of ineligibility on the advanced-degree question, but held that any procedural error was effectively cured because the Petitioner received notice through the denial and could submit additional evidence on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conceded the record did not contain clear evidence of ineligibility on the advanced-degree question, but held that any procedural error was effectively cured because the Petitioner received notice through the denial and could submit additional evidence on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-30_01_B5203; source_row=21077 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary's possession of education required by labor certification and classification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The educational evaluation did not conclude the 3-year Indian degree equated to a U.S. bachelor's, the PGD evaluation did not examine entrance requirements or establish issuance by a college or university, and combining lesser credentials cannot satisfy the single-degree requirement for advanced-degree professional classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The educational evaluation did not conclude the 3-year Indian degree equated to a U.S. bachelor's, the PGD evaluation did not examine entrance requirements or establish issuance by a college or university, and combining lesser credentials cannot satisfy the single-degree requirement for advanced-degree professional classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-30_01_B5203; source_row=21075 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification requires an advanced degree professional
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO held that the modifier 'equivalent' in '3-year foreign equivalent degree' means the degree must equate to a U.S. bachelor's, and 3-year foreign degrees (e.g., U.K. bachelor's degrees) can qualify; the labor certification therefore required the equivalent of an advanced degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that the modifier 'equivalent' in '3-year foreign equivalent degree' means the degree must equate to a U.S. bachelor's, and 3-year foreign degrees (e.g., U.K. bachelor's degrees) can qualify; the labor certification therefore required the equivalent of an advanced degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-30_01_B5203; source_row=21074 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reopen Requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new evidence did not resolve the discrepancy between the Beneficiary's claimed employment as a database administrator and his H-4 visa application statement that he worked at his father's motorcycle store during the same period. Additionally, the Petitioner provided no response to AAO's prior finding that the Beneficiary's experience with the Petitioner may be barred as 'substantially comparable' employment under 20 C.F.R.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new evidence did not resolve the discrepancy between the Beneficiary's claimed employment as a database administrator and his H-4 visa application statement that he worked at his father's motorcycle store during the same period. Additionally, the Petitioner provided no response to AAO's prior finding that the Beneficiary's experience with the Petitioner may be barred as 'substantially comparable' employment under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i)(3)(i).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-30_03_B5203; source_row=21080 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner served in a leading or critical role as project director and lead architect for a distinguished organization, overseeing its architecture and construction projects.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner served in a leading or critical role as project director and lead architect for a distinguished organization, overseeing its architecture and construction projects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-27_01_B2203; source_row=21066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner commanded a high salary based on documentation of $250,000 annual compensation and Department of Labor data confirming it was high relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner commanded a high salary based on documentation of $250,000 annual compensation and Department of Labor data confirming it was high relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-27_01_B2203; source_row=21067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c