Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17351–17360

NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life SciencesPostdoctoral ResearcherPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner's research on gigaseal formation, patch clamping, and nano-biotechnology aims to improve neurological disease treatment and drug discovery, demonstrating both substantial merit and national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's research on gigaseal formation, patch clamping, and nano-biotechnology aims to improve neurological disease treatment and drug discovery, demonstrating both substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-04_01_B5203; source_row=20985
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life SciencesPostdoctoral ResearcherPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer

Why the evidence was persuasive

Given the petitioner's specialized expertise, demonstrated record of successful research and leadership, and the importance of his work to U.S. medical and pharmaceutical research interests, on balance it benefits the U.S. to waive the job offer requirement.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
Given the petitioner's specialized expertise, demonstrated record of successful research and leadership, and the importance of his work to U.S. medical and pharmaceutical research interests, on balance it benefits the U.S. to waive the job offer requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-01-04_01_B5203; source_row=20987
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Bank account statements as evidence of ability to pay

Why AAO was not persuaded

Bank statements are not among the three enumerated types of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), only show the amount in an account on a given date rather than sustainable ability to pay, and the Petitioner provided no evidence that the funds in the bank statements reflect additional available funds not already reflected on the tax returns.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Bank statements are not among the three enumerated types of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), only show the amount in an account on a given date rather than sustainable ability to pay, and the Petitioner provided no evidence that the funds in the bank statements reflect additional available funds not already reflected on the tax returns.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-30_01_B5203; source_row=20980
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification minimum requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO raised this issue sua sponte in addition to the Director's decision. The Beneficiary holds a licentiate degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree per AACRAO EDGE, not a master's degree. The labor certification requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent as a minimum for both the primary and alternate requirements, and a combination of education plus experience cannot substitute for the required degree.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte in addition to the Director's decision. The Beneficiary holds a licentiate degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree per AACRAO EDGE, not a master's degree. The labor certification requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent as a minimum for both the primary and alternate requirements, and a combination of education plus experience cannot substitute for the required degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-30_01_B5203; source_row=20982
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Personal assets of company president/shareholders

Why AAO was not persuaded

A corporation is a separate legal entity from its shareholders, and the regulation refers to the employer's ability to pay. Construction and Design did not establish a fiduciary responsibility between the Petitioner and its owners requiring owners to use personal assets to pay the proffered wage.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
A corporation is a separate legal entity from its shareholders, and the regulation refers to the employer's ability to pay. Construction and Design did not establish a fiduciary responsibility between the Petitioner and its owners requiring owners to use personal assets to pay the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-30_01_B5203; source_row=20981
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Net income and net current assets

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's tax returns showed negative net income (-$67,971) and negative net current assets (-$8,171) in 2014, the year at issue, and wages paid to employees were well below the proffered wage of $91,624 in all relevant years.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's tax returns showed negative net income (-$67,971) and negative net current assets (-$8,171) in 2014, the year at issue, and wages paid to employees were well below the proffered wage of $91,624 in all relevant years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-30_01_B5203; source_row=20979
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner submitted no audited financial statements or annual reports as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). The existence of at least four other I-140 petitions further complicated the analysis, and the record lacked information necessary to assess ability to pay combined proffered wages.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted no audited financial statements or annual reports as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). The existence of at least four other I-140 petitions further complicated the analysis, and the record lacked information necessary to assess ability to pay combined proffered wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-30_02_B5203; source_row=20984
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary possesses required educational qualifications per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

EDGE reports that a 2-year Indian master of science degree following a 3-year baccalaureate equates to only a U.S. bachelor's degree. The Petitioner's evaluations did not address or rebut this finding, and the two prior non-precedent decisions are non-binding and one was reversed by AAO itself on reopening.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
EDGE reports that a 2-year Indian master of science degree following a 3-year baccalaureate equates to only a U.S. bachelor's degree. The Petitioner's evaluations did not address or rebut this finding, and the two prior non-precedent decisions are non-binding and one was reversed by AAO itself on reopening.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-30_02_B5203; source_row=20983
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Beneficiary's work has substantial merit because it supports the scientific community and facilitates progress in plant biology research, and is of national importance as a $100 million, 10-year federal investment in cyberinfrastructure with 18,500 users worldwide, contributing to a comprehensive national initiative.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Beneficiary's work has substantial merit because it supports the scientific community and facilitates progress in plant biology research, and is of national importance as a $100 million, 10-year federal investment in cyberinfrastructure with 18,500 users worldwide, contributing to a comprehensive national initiative.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-29_01_B5203; source_row=20976
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Beneficiary's considerable experience and expertise, the national importance of his work, his documented past successes, continued federal funding, and expansion of the project beyond plant sciences demonstrate that the United States will benefit from his contributions even assuming other qualified U.S. workers were available.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's considerable experience and expertise, the national importance of his work, his documented past successes, continued federal funding, and expansion of the project beyond plant sciences demonstrate that the United States will benefit from his contributions even assuming other qualified U.S. workers were available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-29_01_B5203; source_row=20978
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment