Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17401–17410
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other59 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's judging was routine peer review without evidence of distinction; her three-article publication record had limited citation impact (only one article cited 59 times, others uncited); her high salary was only compared to other fellows rather than established radiation oncologists; and her overall record does not reflect a career of acclaimed work placing her at the top of her field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's judging was routine peer review without evidence of distinction; her three-article publication record had limited citation impact (only one article cited 59 times, others uncited); her high salary was only compared to other fellows rather than established radiation oncologists; and her overall record does not reflect a career of acclaimed work placing her at the top of her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-06_01_B2203; source_row=20936 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other59 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the criterion met because the Petitioner established her salary as a radiology fellow was high in relation to other radiology fellows, disagreeing with the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the criterion met because the Petitioner established her salary as a radiology fellow was high in relation to other radiology fellows, disagreeing with the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-06_01_B2203; source_row=20935 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Possession of required educational credentials (bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Beneficiary possesses a 3-year bachelor of commerce degree that her own evaluator acknowledges equates to only 3 years of U.S. university study, not a full U.S. bachelor's degree. The labor certification requires a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent with no alternate combination accepted. The Act and its legislative history preclude combining educational credentials to meet the bachelor's degree requirement.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary possesses a 3-year bachelor of commerce degree that her own evaluator acknowledges equates to only 3 years of U.S. university study, not a full U.S. bachelor's degree. The labor certification requires a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent with no alternate combination accepted. The Act and its legislative history preclude combining educational credentials to meet the bachelor's degree requirement. The Petitioner's 'single source' exception has no legal authority.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-05_01_B5203; source_row=20928 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serving the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the supervisor letters described the Petitioner's chemistry job duties and prospective teaching potential but did not show past influence on the field; teaching credentials and a tentative job offer likewise did not establish influence on education. Worker shortages and unique skills are matters for the labor certification process.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the supervisor letters described the Petitioner's chemistry job duties and prospective teaching potential but did not show past influence on the field; teaching credentials and a tentative job offer likewise did not establish influence on education. Worker shortages and unique skills are matters for the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-02_02_B5203; source_row=20927 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the impact of a single schoolteacher would not extend beyond the students and school district, and that general arguments about STEM importance and teacher shortages address intrinsic merit, not national scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the impact of a single schoolteacher would not extend beyond the students and school district, and that general arguments about STEM importance and teacher shortages address intrinsic merit, not national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-02_02_B5203; source_row=20926 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay combined proffered wages of all pending petitions
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even though the Petitioner's disclosed 2015 net income of $322,532 exceeded the $142,917.60 shortfall between combined proffered wages and wages paid for the identified petitions, the Petitioner omitted four additional petitions from its list that USCIS records showed remained pending.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even though the Petitioner's disclosed 2015 net income of $322,532 exceeded the $142,917.60 shortfall between combined proffered wages and wages paid for the identified petitions, the Petitioner omitted four additional petitions from its list that USCIS records showed remained pending. Without their proffered wages and payment data, the record could not establish the Petitioner's ability to pay all applicable combined proffered wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-02_01_B5203; source_row=20924 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary possession of required educational credentials
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Beneficiary's 3-year polytechnical diploma allowed lateral entry into the second year of the 4-year bachelor's program, making his bachelor's degree equivalent to a 4-year U.S. degree. EDGE confirmed that a 3-year Indian engineering diploma equates to one year of U.S. university credit, and that an Indian bachelor of engineering/technology is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's 3-year polytechnical diploma allowed lateral entry into the second year of the 4-year bachelor's program, making his bachelor's degree equivalent to a 4-year U.S. degree. EDGE confirmed that a 3-year Indian engineering diploma equates to one year of U.S. university credit, and that an Indian bachelor of engineering/technology is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-12-02_01_B5203; source_row=20923 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c