Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17431–17440

EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner had submitted falsified articles discussing the Beneficiary's exhibitions, which cast doubt on the reliability and sufficiency of all evidence offered in support of this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner had submitted falsified articles discussing the Beneficiary's exhibitions, which cast doubt on the reliability and sufficiency of all evidence offered in support of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_01_B2203; source_row=20895
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The awards from the exhibitions were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized in the visual arts field; the Beneficiary received only 'additional awards' (not first or second place); the publication lacked objective circulation figures; and consignment agreements and artist contracts do not constitute prizes or awards for excellence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The awards from the exhibitions were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized in the visual arts field; the Beneficiary received only 'additional awards' (not first or second place); the publication lacked objective circulation figures; and consignment agreements and artist contracts do not constitute prizes or awards for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_01_B2203; source_row=20892
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

Two submitted articles were falsified by substituting the Beneficiary's name, undermining the credibility of all related evidence. Remaining articles either did not mention the Beneficiary, lacked required author identification, lacked certified translations, or lacked evidence that the publications qualified as major media.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Two submitted articles were falsified by substituting the Beneficiary's name, undermining the credibility of all related evidence. Remaining articles either did not mention the Beneficiary, lacked required author identification, lacked certified translations, or lacked evidence that the publications qualified as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_01_B2203; source_row=20893
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's documented authorship of scholarly articles in a quarterly journal satisfies this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's documented authorship of scholarly articles in a quarterly journal satisfies this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=20903
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's service as a scientific referee for a journal established that he meets the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's service as a scientific referee for a journal established that he meets the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=20902
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record contained no financial documentation of any kind and no evidence the Beneficiary was actually employed and paid by the Petitioner. Additionally, the Petitioner appeared to be suspended by California's Franchise Tax Board, further undermining its ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record contained no financial documentation of any kind and no evidence the Beneficiary was actually employed and paid by the Petitioner. Additionally, the Petitioner appeared to be suspended by California's Franchise Tax Board, further undermining its ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_01_B5203; source_row=20900
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Bona fide job opportunity

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO applied the Modular Container factors and found that the familial relationship between the Beneficiary (brother) and the sole owner, the small employee count (five), and the failure to disclose the relationship on the labor certification collectively demonstrated the job opportunity was not genuinely open to all qualified U.S. workers.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO applied the Modular Container factors and found that the familial relationship between the Beneficiary (brother) and the sole owner, the small employee count (five), and the failure to disclose the relationship on the labor certification collectively demonstrated the job opportunity was not genuinely open to all qualified U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_01_B5203; source_row=20898
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary qualifying experience per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The experience letters submitted lacked descriptions of the Beneficiary's job duties and hours worked per week, precluding AAO from verifying that the required 36 months of qualifying experience as a systems administrator had been met, particularly given the Beneficiary allegedly worked for four employers simultaneously at 110 hours per week.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The experience letters submitted lacked descriptions of the Beneficiary's job duties and hours worked per week, precluding AAO from verifying that the required 36 months of qualifying experience as a systems administrator had been met, particularly given the Beneficiary allegedly worked for four employers simultaneously at 110 hours per week.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_01_B5203; source_row=20899
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in passing that the aggregate record did not support the required level of expertise.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in passing that the aggregate record did not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-25_01_B2203; source_row=20897
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

The submitted magazine pages credited the Petitioner as a photographic re-toucher but neither included the required title and author of the material, nor constituted published material 'about' him — they were merely captions or credits identifying him, not articles featuring or discussing him or his work.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The submitted magazine pages credited the Petitioner as a photographic re-toucher but neither included the required title and author of the material, nor constituted published material 'about' him — they were merely captions or credits identifying him, not articles featuring or discussing him or his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-23_02_B2203; source_row=20884
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment