Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17451–17460
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials SciencePhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three criteria, but noted in aggregate that the record does not support sustained acclaim or top-of-field expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three criteria, but noted in aggregate that the record does not support sustained acclaim or top-of-field expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-23_01_B2203; source_row=20883 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials SciencePhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record demonstrated that the Petitioner's involvement with the anti-smuggling legislation constitutes an original contribution of major significance in the field, as supported by letters describing his successful efforts to organize lobbying for the Venezuelan government and congress.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The record demonstrated that the Petitioner's involvement with the anti-smuggling legislation constitutes an original contribution of major significance in the field, as supported by letters describing his successful efforts to organize lobbying for the Venezuelan government and congress.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-23_01_B2203; source_row=20880 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials SciencePhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record included an article about the Petitioner discussing his role in his company's productivity, and the Petitioner submitted sufficient documentation demonstrating that the publication is a professional publication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record included an article about the Petitioner discussing his role in his company's productivity, and the Petitioner submitted sufficient documentation demonstrating that the publication is a professional publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-23_01_B2203; source_row=20879 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's $120,000 salary fell substantially below the top 10% threshold for software developers per BLS data. The compensation survey was missing key pages, and even if complete, comparing a director of engineering to general software engineers was inappropriate. Stock options were common for early startup employees and post-filing compensation could not be considered.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's $120,000 salary fell substantially below the top 10% threshold for software developers per BLS data. The compensation survey was missing key pages, and even if complete, comparing a director of engineering to general software engineers was inappropriate. Stock options were common for early startup employees and post-filing compensation could not be considered. The Petitioner failed to provide payroll records and did not compare his compensation to others performing similar managerial services.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=20865 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The articles submitted were about the Petitioner's employers and their services, not about the Petitioner himself. The Petitioner waived further argument by failing to challenge the Director's findings on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles submitted were about the Petitioner's employers and their services, not about the Petitioner himself. The Petitioner waived further argument by failing to challenge the Director's findings on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=20860 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The unsubstantiated employer performance award lacked documentary support. The Indian examination results were not awards for excellence in the Petitioner's field of software engineering, and the government official's conclusory letter could not elevate them to nationally recognized awards in that field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The unsubstantiated employer performance award lacked documentary support. The Indian examination results were not awards for excellence in the Petitioner's field of software engineering, and the government official's conclusory letter could not elevate them to nationally recognized awards in that field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=20859 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The blog post was not scholarly and did not appear in a professional or major trade publication or major media. The Petitioner abandoned further argument by not challenging the Director's findings on this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The blog post was not scholarly and did not appear in a professional or major trade publication or major media. The Petitioner abandoned further argument by not challenging the Director's findings on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=20863 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineer
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters described the Petitioner's useful work for employers and clients but did not explain how his contributions affected the broader field of software engineering. The plain language requires contributions of major significance in the field, not merely to employers and their customers.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters described the Petitioner's useful work for employers and clients but did not explain how his contributions affected the broader field of software engineering. The plain language requires contributions of major significance in the field, not merely to employers and their customers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=20862 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Letters contained distinctly similar prepopulated language and lacked specifics on how the Petitioner's contributions had significant effect. Award claims were largely uncorroborated, and even corroborated awards did not show the Petitioner's influence on the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Letters contained distinctly similar prepopulated language and lacked specifics on how the Petitioner's contributions had significant effect. Award claims were largely uncorroborated, and even corroborated awards did not show the Petitioner's influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_02_B2203; source_row=20873 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c