Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to support his television broadcasting claims and did not establish that his work was of an artistic nature or that the venues were artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to support his television broadcasting claims and did not establish that his work was of an artistic nature or that the venues were artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_02_B2203; source_row=20874 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
While membership was confirmed, the Petitioner did not submit bylaws or other documentation showing the associations require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While membership was confirmed, the Petitioner did not submit bylaws or other documentation showing the associations require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_02_B2203; source_row=20870 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Awards received by athletes the Petitioner promoted/coached do not count under this criterion. The Petitioner himself received only an unidentified Certificate of Achievement not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Awards received by athletes the Petitioner promoted/coached do not count under this criterion. The Petitioner himself received only an unidentified Certificate of Achievement not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_02_B2203; source_row=20869 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
Translations were uncertified and lacked authors. Even assuming two articles were about the Petitioner, he failed to show the publications were professional or major trade publications. Other articles were not about him.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Translations were uncertified and lacked authors. Even assuming two articles were about the Petitioner, he failed to show the publications were professional or major trade publications. Other articles were not about him.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_02_B2203; source_row=20871 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ability to pay proffered wage from priority date onward
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the Petitioner had not established ability to pay, identifying additional shortcomings including obligations during pendency of withdrawn/denied petitions, 22 previously approved beneficiaries unaccounted for, an enlarged shortfall figure of $118,121.50, and the impermissible combining of net income with net current assets.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner had not established ability to pay, identifying additional shortcomings including obligations during pendency of withdrawn/denied petitions, 22 previously approved beneficiaries unaccounted for, an enlarged shortfall figure of $118,121.50, and the impermissible combining of net income with net current assets.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B5203; source_row=20868 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary holds master's or foreign equivalent in computer science or engineering
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the credentials evaluation insufficient because it cited no comparable U.S. program combining the two disciplines, did not compare curricula, and conflicted with EDGE; also noted the issuing institution itself distinguishes computer science (M. Tech) from computer applications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the credentials evaluation insufficient because it cited no comparable U.S. program combining the two disciplines, did not compare curricula, and conflicted with EDGE; also noted the issuing institution itself distinguishes computer science (M. Tech) from computer applications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B5203; source_row=20867 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineer
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the finding that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the finding that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=20864 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineer
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly noted it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold three-criteria requirement, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly noted it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold three-criteria requirement, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=20866 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c