Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17481–17490

EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed that without complete translations the regulatory requirement at 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) is not met, the brief excerpts fail to establish the articles are 'about' the Petitioner, and the Petitioner did not document that publications were major media or properly advance a comparable evidence argument.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that without complete translations the regulatory requirement at 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) is not met, the brief excerpts fail to establish the articles are 'about' the Petitioner, and the Petitioner did not document that publications were major media or properly advance a comparable evidence argument.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-07_01_B2203; source_row=20844
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Major award

one-time achievement / major internationally recognized award

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner had not established that either of the international competitions where he finished in the top three are internationally recognized in the field as one of the top awards for ice skating. The Petitioner ultimately abandoned this claim in response to the RFE.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner had not established that either of the international competitions where he finished in the top three are internationally recognized in the field as one of the top awards for ice skating. The Petitioner ultimately abandoned this claim in response to the RFE.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-07_01_B2203; source_row=20841
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded that athletic figure skating competitions are not artistic exhibitions or showcases within the meaning of the criterion, even if artistic elements are included in scoring. The Petitioner did not show he displayed his talent at exhibitions or showcases other than sports competitions, and accepting his argument would improperly merge two criteria for athletes in sports with artistic elements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that athletic figure skating competitions are not artistic exhibitions or showcases within the meaning of the criterion, even if artistic elements are included in scoring. The Petitioner did not show he displayed his talent at exhibitions or showcases other than sports competitions, and accepting his argument would improperly merge two criteria for athletes in sports with artistic elements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-07_01_B2203; source_row=20845
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Schedule A job offer requires individual of exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Form 9089 description conclusory, the headmaster's letter and salary data unpersuasive, and concluded the job offer portion of the Schedule A application does not show the position requires exceptional ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Form 9089 description conclusory, the headmaster's letter and salary data unpersuasive, and concluded the job offer portion of the Schedule A application does not show the position requires exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-07_01_B5203; source_row=20848
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found in the RFE that the Petitioner's membership on a national team served to meet this criterion, as the competitive nature of the selection process for such a team satisfies the requirement for outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found in the RFE that the Petitioner's membership on a national team served to meet this criterion, as the competitive nature of the selection process for such a team satisfies the requirement for outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-07_01_B2203; source_row=20843
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed that the Petitioner's competition results, including placing first through third at events and representing his country at two international competitions, satisfy this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner's competition results, including placing first through third at events and representing his country at two international competitions, satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-07_01_B2203; source_row=20842
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner did not provide specific information about how he fit within the hierarchy of the national team or his impact on the team. Letters from coaches were conclusory, and merely asserting that meeting one criterion (membership) presumes meeting another is inconsistent with the statutory requirement for extensive evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner did not provide specific information about how he fit within the hierarchy of the national team or his impact on the team. Letters from coaches were conclusory, and merely asserting that meeting one criterion (membership) presumes meeting another is inconsistent with the statutory requirement for extensive evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-07_01_B2203; source_row=20846
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Successor in interest to labor certification employer

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although AAO withdrew the Director's subsidiary findings regarding affiliate/parent relationships (those being established by public records), AAO agreed that the Petitioner itself did not acquire the essential rights and obligations of the labor certification employer. The Petitioner was not a party to the acquisition agreement, and an affiliate's or parent's successorship cannot be imputed to the Petitioner.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although AAO withdrew the Director's subsidiary findings regarding affiliate/parent relationships (those being established by public records), AAO agreed that the Petitioner itself did not acquire the essential rights and obligations of the labor certification employer. The Petitioner was not a party to the acquisition agreement, and an affiliate's or parent's successorship cannot be imputed to the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=20840
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found a diverse skill set, future training to become an examiner, and teaching students who won competitions did not constitute original contributions of major significance to the field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found a diverse skill set, future training to become an examiner, and teaching students who won competitions did not constitute original contributions of major significance to the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=20836
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner's evidence in the aggregate showed talent but not sustained acclaim or top-of-field status; venues were local, judging was of students/amateurs, and publications had limited impact.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's evidence in the aggregate showed talent but not sustained acclaim or top-of-field status; venues were local, judging was of students/amateurs, and publications had limited impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=20839
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment