Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found uncertified and partial translations diminished probative value, and the Petitioner did not show the works were peer-reviewed, scholarly, or published in major trade publications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found uncertified and partial translations diminished probative value, and the Petitioner did not show the works were peer-reviewed, scholarly, or published in major trade publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=20837 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the materials largely listed her among competitors or advertised shows rather than constituting published material about her in professional or major trade media; a single local article three years before filing was insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the materials largely listed her among competitors or advertised shows rather than constituting published material about her in professional or major trade media; a single local article three years before filing was insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=20834 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not provide evidence of credentials, the emails do not mention the Petitioner by name, were sent after the filing date, and do not constitute documentation of membership in a professional association.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide evidence of credentials, the emails do not mention the Petitioner by name, were sent after the filing date, and do not constitute documentation of membership in a professional association.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20824 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
Salary demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The salary offer was received after the petition was filed, does not relate to journalism or political editing, and the Petitioner provided no comparative basis to show the salary demonstrates exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The salary offer was received after the petition was filed, does not relate to journalism or political editing, and the Petitioner provided no comparative basis to show the salary demonstrates exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_01_B5203; source_row=20823 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials SciencePhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve national interest to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his work has already influenced the field as a whole. His publications and patents were insufficient without a citation record or letters showing actual use or impact, and his claim of uniqueness does not satisfy the national interest threshold.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his work has already influenced the field as a whole. His publications and patents were insufficient without a citation record or letters showing actual use or impact, and his claim of uniqueness does not satisfy the national interest threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-31_02_B5203; source_row=20831 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c