Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17521–17530

EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the aggregate the record does not establish the required level of expertise.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the aggregate the record does not establish the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=20802
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated leading roles at both organizations but that neither organization was shown to have a distinguished reputation. The painters' organization lacked evidence of standing in the field, and the university's rankings did not establish a distinguished reputation under the regulation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated leading roles at both organizations but that neither organization was shown to have a distinguished reputation. The painters' organization lacked evidence of standing in the field, and the university's rankings did not establish a distinguished reputation under the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=20801
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

Why AAO was not persuaded

The executive director role is akin to a job position rather than association membership. The association's membership requirements were not shown to be equivalent to outstanding achievements, and its directors were not established to be recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The executive director role is akin to a job position rather than association membership. The association's membership requirements were not shown to be equivalent to outstanding achievements, and its directors were not established to be recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=20796
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner documented receipt of various awards but did not provide sufficient information establishing that they are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. The fellowship was not shown to be a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner documented receipt of various awards but did not provide sufficient information establishing that they are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. The fellowship was not shown to be a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=20795
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record did not include the actual articles (no English translation provided), so the Petitioner could not demonstrate they were peer-reviewed, contained references, or were otherwise scholarly.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The record did not include the actual articles (no English translation provided), so the Petitioner could not demonstrate they were peer-reviewed, contained references, or were otherwise scholarly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=20799
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that reference letters praising the Petitioner's potential impact were unsupported by objective evidence; her publications and presentations showed findings were shared but did not establish field-wide influence; the record lacked evidence of widespread citation or implementation of her research; and her special qualifications relative to other workers do not inherently meet the national interest threshold.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that reference letters praising the Petitioner's potential impact were unsupported by objective evidence; her publications and presentations showed findings were shared but did not establish field-wide influence; the record lacked evidence of widespread citation or implementation of her research; and her special qualifications relative to other workers do not inherently meet the national interest threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_02_B5203; source_row=20808
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that patient care benefits were not national in scope, but found the Petitioner submitted sufficient documentation to show her pulmonary research benefits are national in scope, and withdrew the Director's finding on that issue.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that patient care benefits were not national in scope, but found the Petitioner submitted sufficient documentation to show her pulmonary research benefits are national in scope, and withdrew the Director's finding on that issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_02_B5203; source_row=20807
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's work in pulmonology and critical care research is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's work in pulmonology and critical care research is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_02_B5203; source_row=20806
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherProfessor

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner's patents, publications, awards, and reference letters failed to demonstrate a past record of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a whole.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's patents, publications, awards, and reference letters failed to demonstrate a past record of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a whole. Reference letters lacked specificity and corroborating documentary evidence, patent certificates did not demonstrate influence on the field, publications had no evidence of independent citations, award certificates were not shown to reflect influence in the monitoring system industry, and magazine interviews lacked certified translations and circulation data.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_01_B5203; source_row=20805
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherProfessor

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO accepted the Director's finding that the Petitioner's work in monitoring system technologies has substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO accepted the Director's finding that the Petitioner's work in monitoring system technologies has substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-25_01_B5203; source_row=20803
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment