Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17541–17550

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalManager30 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

influence on the field / substantially greater than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the reference letters and evidence did not show the petitioner's research had been widely implemented in clinical settings, had garnered significant independent citations, or had otherwise influenced the field as a whole. Uncorroborated and conclusory assertions were given limited weight, and conference presentations and peer review participation alone were insufficient.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the reference letters and evidence did not show the petitioner's research had been widely implemented in clinical settings, had garnered significant independent citations, or had otherwise influenced the field as a whole. Uncorroborated and conclusory assertions were given limited weight, and conference presentations and peer review participation alone were insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=20785
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalManager30 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO disagreed with the director's reasoning that work performed in Korea cannot satisfy the national-scope prong, noting the prong is prospective in nature. The petitioner's dissemination of research through international conferences and journals showed national and international scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director's reasoning that work performed in Korea cannot satisfy the national-scope prong, noting the prong is prospective in nature. The petitioner's dissemination of research through international conferences and journals showed national and international scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=20784
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical20 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the Petitioner's radiology research would be national in scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the Petitioner's radiology research would be national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-20_03_B5203; source_row=20790
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical20 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that online views do not confirm reliance on or impact from the Petitioner's research; the award lacked context regarding selectivity; conference presentations lacked evidence of citation or adoption; reference letters were uncorroborated and did not show that findings became part of treatment protocols; and peer review is routine.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that online views do not confirm reliance on or impact from the Petitioner's research; the award lacked context regarding selectivity; conference presentations lacked evidence of citation or adoption; reference letters were uncorroborated and did not show that findings became part of treatment protocols; and peer review is routine. Taken together, the record did not show a history of demonstrable achievement with sufficient influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-20_03_B5203; source_row=20791
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical20 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's work as a physician in interventional radiology is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's work as a physician in interventional radiology is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-20_03_B5203; source_row=20789
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Correct classification adjudicated

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Director's treatment of the case was both factually and legally incorrect because the Petitioner had plainly sought classification as an alien of exceptional ability and the Director adjudicated a classification never requested, necessitating remand.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's treatment of the case was both factually and legally incorrect because the Petitioner had plainly sought classification as an alien of exceptional ability and the Director adjudicated a classification never requested, necessitating remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-19_01_B5203; source_row=20782
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay in 2014 based on audited financials including all I-140 beneficiaries

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although the 2014 audited financials showed figures sufficient for the instant Beneficiary alone, the Petitioner repeatedly failed to provide proffered and actual wage information for its numerous other Form I-140 beneficiaries despite being specifically requested to do so. Without that information, total wage obligations cannot be determined and ability to pay cannot be established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although the 2014 audited financials showed figures sufficient for the instant Beneficiary alone, the Petitioner repeatedly failed to provide proffered and actual wage information for its numerous other Form I-140 beneficiaries despite being specifically requested to do so. Without that information, total wage obligations cannot be determined and ability to pay cannot be established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-18_01_B5203; source_row=20780
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay under totality of circumstances (Sonegawa)

Why AAO was not persuaded

Even under a Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis, the Petitioner failed to establish ability to pay because the record showed only two years of data (too short to demonstrate historic growth), no evidence of industry reputation, and no information about wage obligations to its many other I-140 beneficiaries.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Even under a Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis, the Petitioner failed to establish ability to pay because the record showed only two years of data (too short to demonstrate historic growth), no evidence of industry reputation, and no information about wage obligations to its many other I-140 beneficiaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-18_01_B5203; source_row=20781
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay in priority date year (2013)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 2013 tax return showed net income and net current assets well below the $89,000 proffered wage. The CPA's argument that cash-method returns should be adjusted to reflect accrual-basis revenues was rejected because the regulation specifically identifies federal tax returns as acceptable evidence, and a petitioner may not selectively shift revenues or expenses to create a hybrid accounting approach.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 2013 tax return showed net income and net current assets well below the $89,000 proffered wage. The CPA's argument that cash-method returns should be adjusted to reflect accrual-basis revenues was rejected because the regulation specifically identifies federal tax returns as acceptable evidence, and a petitioner may not selectively shift revenues or expenses to create a hybrid accounting approach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-18_01_B5203; source_row=20778
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay in 2014 based on tax return

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 2014 tax return was incomplete—missing Schedule K and Schedule L—so net income of $37,472 (below $89,000) was the only figure available, and there was no evidence of net current assets for 2014.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 2014 tax return was incomplete—missing Schedule K and Schedule L—so net income of $37,472 (below $89,000) was the only figure available, and there was no evidence of net current assets for 2014.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-18_01_B5203; source_row=20779
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment