Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17571–17580
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherProfessor
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO accepted that the Petitioner's work as a professor is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted that the Petitioner's work as a professor is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-12_04_B5203; source_row=20764 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that the Petitioner had not shown her classroom instruction produces benefits beyond her students and local school districts, citing NYSDOT's express example that a single schoolteacher in one elementary school does not satisfy the national-in-scope requirement.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that the Petitioner had not shown her classroom instruction produces benefits beyond her students and local school districts, citing NYSDOT's express example that a single schoolteacher in one elementary school does not satisfy the national-in-scope requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-12_02_B5203; source_row=20760 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence shows contributions valuable to the employer and its customers, but there is no documentary evidence that the Petitioner's original work has affected the broader field at the level of major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The evidence shows contributions valuable to the employer and its customers, but there is no documentary evidence that the Petitioner's original work has affected the broader field at the level of major significance. There is no citation record showing influence on independent researchers, no patent documentation showing inventorship, and letters of support were largely conclusory without specific evidence of field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-06_01_B2203; source_row=20750 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The award was granted to the employer company, not to the Petitioner individually. There is no evidence the award specifically identified the Petitioner as a recipient, and news releases are not indicative of national or international recognition of excellence. Employee recognition certificates reflect only institutional recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The award was granted to the employer company, not to the Petitioner individually. There is no evidence the award specifically identified the Petitioner as a recipient, and news releases are not indicative of national or international recognition of excellence. Employee recognition certificates reflect only institutional recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-06_01_B2203; source_row=20748 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted it need not conduct a formal final merits determination given the failure to meet three criteria, but conducted an aggregate review anyway and concluded the record does not show sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted it need not conduct a formal final merits determination given the failure to meet three criteria, but conducted an aggregate review anyway and concluded the record does not show sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-06_01_B2203; source_row=20752 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner provided documentation of peer review for two journals and editorial positions for two publishers, which the AAO agreed satisfies this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner provided documentation of peer review for two journals and editorial positions for two publishers, which the AAO agreed satisfies this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-06_01_B2203; source_row=20749 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The translations did not include authors as required; the screenshots were not accompanied by full certified English translations; the content appeared to be about other topics rather than the Petitioner; and the websites were not shown to be major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The translations did not include authors as required; the screenshots were not accompanied by full certified English translations; the content appeared to be about other topics rather than the Petitioner; and the websites were not shown to be major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=20743 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record did not include sufficient information to establish that the described awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The Petitioner also did not show he received prizes or awards as a rowing coach.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record did not include sufficient information to establish that the described awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The Petitioner also did not show he received prizes or awards as a rowing coach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=20741 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c