Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17581–17590
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to establish the significance of the named competitions or demonstrate influence beyond local rowers. Letters attesting to the Petitioner's skills and coached athletes' results did not establish original contributions of major significance to the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish the significance of the named competitions or demonstrate influence beyond local rowers. Letters attesting to the Petitioner's skills and coached athletes' results did not establish original contributions of major significance to the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=20744 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
possession of a U.S. advanced degree (or foreign equivalent) from an accredited institution
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed that an unaccredited institution's degree does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), distinguished the HEA definition as inapplicable, and held its interpretation is neither plainly erroneous nor inconsistent with the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that an unaccredited institution's degree does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), distinguished the HEA definition as inapplicable, and held its interpretation is neither plainly erroneous nor inconsistent with the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-05_01_B5203; source_row=20746 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ability to pay combined proffered wages of multiple beneficiaries
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner established ability to pay the individual proffered wage in 2014 but not the combined proffered wages of four other pending I-140 beneficiaries, and the Sonegawa totality factors did not cure the deficiency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner established ability to pay the individual proffered wage in 2014 but not the combined proffered wages of four other pending I-140 beneficiaries, and the Sonegawa totality factors did not cure the deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-05_01_B5203; source_row=20747 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner's membership on the national team is an association membership requiring outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized national experts in rowing, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's membership on the national team is an association membership requiring outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized national experts in rowing, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=20742 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=20745 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the wage data submitted (SOC 25-3099 - Teachers and Instructors, All Other) is not a meaningful comparison for a secondary teacher (SOC 25-2031), and the bottom of the proposed wage range merely matched the prevailing wage.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the wage data submitted (SOC 25-3099 - Teachers and Instructors, All Other) is not a meaningful comparison for a secondary teacher (SOC 25-2031), and the bottom of the proposed wage range merely matched the prevailing wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-04_01_B5203; source_row=20739 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination - degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the Beneficiary's education, minimum certification, and union membership are prerequisites for the job rather than indicia of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered. The Petitioner's argument that USCIS may not perform a qualitative review in PERM cases was rejected.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Beneficiary's education, minimum certification, and union membership are prerequisites for the job rather than indicia of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered. The Petitioner's argument that USCIS may not perform a qualitative review in PERM cases was rejected.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-04_01_B5203; source_row=20737 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
job requires license or certification - 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C)
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO accepted that because state law requires all teachers to be certified, the job requires a license or certification, withdrawing this aspect of the Director's analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted that because state law requires all teachers to be certified, the job requires a license or certification, withdrawing this aspect of the Director's analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-10-04_01_B5203; source_row=20738 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c