Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17611–17620
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalResearcher
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO finds that the proposed benefits of medical and health research are national in scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds that the proposed benefits of medical and health research are national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-29_02_B5203; source_row=20715 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalResearcher
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker (track record / influence on the field)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes the Petitioner's work, while important and disseminated through some publications and conferences, has not been shown to have influenced the field as a whole; the cited article had only two citations (both from co-authors), and the reference letters do not demonstrate that others in the field are applying his studies.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the Petitioner's work, while important and disseminated through some publications and conferences, has not been shown to have influenced the field as a whole; the cited article had only two citations (both from co-authors), and the reference letters do not demonstrate that others in the field are applying his studies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-29_02_B5203; source_row=20716 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhysician2 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner's research on differentiating Takotsubo cardiomyopathy from acute myocardial infarction was original, the testimonial letters, citation record, poster presentation prize, and publication in prestigious journals did not establish that the work had a measurable major impact on the field.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's research on differentiating Takotsubo cardiomyopathy from acute myocardial infarction was original, the testimonial letters, citation record, poster presentation prize, and publication in prestigious journals did not establish that the work had a measurable major impact on the field. None of the supporting authors identified specific physicians, institutions, or researchers who had implemented the Petitioner's findings, and the citation rate was not shown to be commensurate with major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-28_01_B2203; source_row=20705 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concurred with the Director that the reference letters describing the Petitioner's fellowship activities did not establish that he performed a leading or critical role for the hospitals or departments as a whole.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred with the Director that the reference letters describing the Petitioner's fellowship activities did not establish that he performed a leading or critical role for the hospitals or departments as a whole. The letters described general advanced training activities and research but did not show the Petitioner's specific impact on the organizations' outcomes or activities, and no organizational chart or comparable evidence documented his hierarchical position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-28_01_B2203; source_row=20707 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhysician2 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO stated that while a full final merits determination was not required since the Petitioner failed the threshold criteria count, a review of the aggregate record nonetheless supported a finding that the Petitioner had not established the level of expertise required for extraordinary ability classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated that while a full final merits determination was not required since the Petitioner failed the threshold criteria count, a review of the aggregate record nonetheless supported a finding that the Petitioner had not established the level of expertise required for extraordinary ability classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-28_01_B2203; source_row=20708 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
bona fide job offer at time of labor certification filing and continuing
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that below-proffered-wage payments alone showed lack of bona fides, but agreed on the ultimate finding. AAO found that the 2003 Social Security Statement inconsistency undermined employment evidence for that year, and that the Petitioner's 0-employee quarterly returns in 2010 and overall evidence failed to establish a continuous bona fide full-time job offer.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that below-proffered-wage payments alone showed lack of bona fides, but agreed on the ultimate finding. AAO found that the 2003 Social Security Statement inconsistency undermined employment evidence for that year, and that the Petitioner's 0-employee quarterly returns in 2010 and overall evidence failed to establish a continuous bona fide full-time job offer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-28_01_B5203; source_row=20710 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ability to pay proffered wage from priority date onward
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that ability to pay was not met except in 2004 and 2005, but disagreed with the Director's exclusion of post-porting bank records. AAO found that the 2003 analysis was deficient due to missing complete tax return and personal expenses, the bank records were insufficient to cover the proffered wage on a continuing basis, and no tax returns were provided for 2009 onward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that ability to pay was not met except in 2004 and 2005, but disagreed with the Director's exclusion of post-porting bank records. AAO found that the 2003 analysis was deficient due to missing complete tax return and personal expenses, the bank records were insufficient to cover the proffered wage on a continuing basis, and no tax returns were provided for 2009 onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-28_01_B5203; source_row=20709 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the plain language of the judging criterion by submitting emails confirming completion of peer review of at least two scientific articles submitted for publication.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the plain language of the judging criterion by submitting emails confirming completion of peer review of at least two scientific articles submitted for publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-28_01_B2203; source_row=20704 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion by authoring seven articles published in professional journals.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion by authoring seven articles published in professional journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-28_01_B2203; source_row=20706 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c