Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The letter from the association's former president did not address membership requirements, and the Petitioner herself acknowledged the association does not require outstanding achievements. As for the fellowship, the certificate was dated after the appeal was filed, eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and the Petitioner failed to submit membership requirements or bylaws.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letter from the association's former president did not address membership requirements, and the Petitioner herself acknowledged the association does not require outstanding achievements. As for the fellowship, the certificate was dated after the appeal was filed, eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and the Petitioner failed to submit membership requirements or bylaws.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20699 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letter from the association president offered historical background and eligibility criteria for the merit badge but did not demonstrate that the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letter from the association president offered historical background and eligibility criteria for the merit badge but did not demonstrate that the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20698 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The ranking document submitted by the Petitioner did not identify its source or confirm the claimed rankings. The association's journal was not shown to be highly ranked, and the Petitioner did not otherwise establish that the organization has a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The ranking document submitted by the Petitioner did not identify its source or confirm the claimed rankings. The association's journal was not shown to be highly ranked, and the Petitioner did not otherwise establish that the organization has a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20702 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record documented the Petitioner's authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications, confirming the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The record documented the Petitioner's authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications, confirming the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20701 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the new evidence submitted on appeal — documentation of peer review of scholarly articles for professional journals — was sufficient to establish that the Petitioner participated in judging the work of others.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the new evidence submitted on appeal — documentation of peer review of scholarly articles for professional journals — was sufficient to establish that the Petitioner participated in judging the work of others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20700 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherProfessor
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=20703 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
Working in multiple geographic jurisdictions does not make an individual classroom teacher's work national in scope; her work does not significantly contribute to national educational goals at a nationally significant level, consistent with NYSDOT's example of an elementary school teacher.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Working in multiple geographic jurisdictions does not make an individual classroom teacher's work national in scope; her work does not significantly contribute to national educational goals at a nationally significant level, consistent with NYSDOT's example of an elementary school teacher.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=20695 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest served to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letters indicate she is a well-liked and conscientious teacher with a lengthy career but do not claim she has had an impact on the field of teaching as a whole, and the materials do not set her apart from other competent and qualified teachers.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters indicate she is a well-liked and conscientious teacher with a lengthy career but do not claim she has had an impact on the field of teaching as a whole, and the materials do not set her apart from other competent and qualified teachers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=20696 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c