Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17631–17640
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's work is national in scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's work is national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-16_01_B5203; source_row=20692 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that direct use of the Petitioner's algorithms by a major research mission, corroborated by multiple expert letters, constituted persuasive evidence of substantial impact on the field as a whole, satisfying the requirement of a past history of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that direct use of the Petitioner's algorithms by a major research mission, corroborated by multiple expert letters, constituted persuasive evidence of substantial impact on the field as a whole, satisfying the requirement of a past history of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-16_01_B5203; source_row=20693 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO discussed awards primarily in the final merits section, finding that festival awards went to the films' director rather than to her, and that other claimed prizes were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO discussed awards primarily in the final merits section, finding that festival awards went to the films' director rather than to her, and that other claimed prizes were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-15_01_B2203; source_row=20681 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO addressed this primarily in the final merits analysis, concluding her contributions to a single dance scene and other productions were not leading or critical and that the organizations' distinguished reputation was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO addressed this primarily in the final merits analysis, concluding her contributions to a single dance scene and other productions were not leading or critical and that the organizations' distinguished reputation was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-15_01_B2203; source_row=20685 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO weighed the evidence and found that festival awards went to others, the single blog article and reviews about productions do not show acclaim about her, judging local youth dance was not nationally significant, and her stage and choreography work did not differentiate her from others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO weighed the evidence and found that festival awards went to others, the single blog article and reviews about productions do not show acclaim about her, judging local youth dance was not nationally significant, and her stage and choreography work did not differentiate her from others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-15_01_B2203; source_row=20686 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner's company performed services for clients in the Texas region and enabled those clients to communicate with out-of-state parties, this does not show national-level benefits. Engaging in interstate commerce or enabling clients' interstate connectivity does not by itself establish national scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's company performed services for clients in the Texas region and enabled those clients to communicate with out-of-state parties, this does not show national-level benefits. Engaging in interstate commerce or enabling clients' interstate connectivity does not by itself establish national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-15_01_B5203; source_row=20689 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c