Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17651–17660

NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience in the occupation

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO disagreed with the Director, finding the experience documented was not in the DOL-certified occupation (dietitian/nutritionist). Letters used the term 'nutritionist' but described duties more consistent with kitchen management than nutrition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding the experience documented was not in the DOL-certified occupation (dietitian/nutritionist). Letters used the term 'nutritionist' but described duties more consistent with kitchen management than nutrition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-13_01_B5203; source_row=20674
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

other

job requires an individual of exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner's listed requirements (associate degree, experience in alternate occupation, prevailing wage, knowledge of kosher laws) did not establish that the certified dietitian/nutritionist position requires exceptional ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner's listed requirements (associate degree, experience in alternate occupation, prevailing wage, knowledge of kosher laws) did not establish that the certified dietitian/nutritionist position requires exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-13_01_B5203; source_row=20680
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWrecognitionNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

Reference letters described Beneficiary's contributions to two restaurants' menus but did not show recognition for significant contributions to the industry or field. Contributing to a single restaurant's success without showing influence on broader trends is insufficient.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Reference letters described Beneficiary's contributions to two restaurants' menus but did not show recognition for significant contributions to the industry or field. Contributing to a single restaurant's success without showing influence on broader trends is insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-13_01_B5203; source_row=20678
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

artistic display

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that criterion vii applies to artists and requires display at artistic exhibitions or showcases. A competitive soccer player performing in stadiums does not meet this requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that criterion vii applies to artists and requires display at artistic exhibitions or showcases. A competitive soccer player performing in stadiums does not meet this requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=20647
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner only compared his salary to a selective list of teammates rather than to others in the broader field of soccer. He also failed to show that his sign-on bonus was significantly high compared to other soccer players in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner only compared his salary to a selective list of teammates rather than to others in the broader field of soccer. He also failed to show that his sign-on bonus was significantly high compared to other soccer players in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=20649
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

The articles were not about the Petitioner but about his teams and matches, only mentioning him incidentally. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that a circulation of 16,000 is indicative of a major medium in Georgia, as no comparative circulation statistics were provided.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The articles were not about the Petitioner but about his teams and matches, only mentioning him incidentally. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that a circulation of 16,000 is indicative of a major medium in Georgia, as no comparative circulation statistics were provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=20646
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The plain language of the regulation requires the alien to have actually received the awards. For the 2009 championship, Petitioner was on the reserve team and not shown to be on the winning team. For the bronze medals, the record did not sufficiently demonstrate his role to credit him with winning those awards.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The plain language of the regulation requires the alien to have actually received the awards. For the 2009 championship, Petitioner was on the reserve team and not shown to be on the winning team. For the bronze medals, the record did not sufficiently demonstrate his role to credit him with winning those awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=20644
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner failed to show that the national team requires outstanding achievements as an essential condition for membership. The selection criteria described were based on personal athletic skills rather than prior outstanding achievements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to show that the national team requires outstanding achievements as an essential condition for membership. The selection criteria described were based on personal athletic skills rather than prior outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=20645
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it did not establish the level of expertise required for the EB-1A classification, though it declined to conduct a formal Kazarian step-2 analysis given the failure at step 1.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it did not establish the level of expertise required for the EB-1A classification, though it declined to conduct a formal Kazarian step-2 analysis given the failure at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=20650
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serving the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner had only four independent citations (not six as claimed), and the record did not show that her work had garnered significant independent citations or otherwise influenced the field as a whole. Reference letters made conclusory and uncorroborated claims. Peer review activities were routine and partly post-filing. A shortage of anesthesiologists alone is insufficient to justify the waiver.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had only four independent citations (not six as claimed), and the record did not show that her work had garnered significant independent citations or otherwise influenced the field as a whole. Reference letters made conclusory and uncorroborated claims. Peer review activities were routine and partly post-filing. A shortage of anesthesiologists alone is insufficient to justify the waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-12_01_B5203; source_row=20653
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment