Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17681–17690
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that work benefitting an individual school district is not national in scope, and that national STEM initiatives do not exempt educators from satisfying the NYSDOT framework or indicate that one teacher will have a national-level impact.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that work benefitting an individual school district is not national in scope, and that national STEM initiatives do not exempt educators from satisfying the NYSDOT framework or indicate that one teacher will have a national-level impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-07_01_B5203; source_row=20642 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest benefit substantially greater than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the petitioner is a highly qualified and well-respected teacher with a lengthy career, the record does not demonstrate that her work has or will result in significant benefits beyond her own classroom, nor that she has exhibited any degree of influence on the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the petitioner is a highly qualified and well-respected teacher with a lengthy career, the record does not demonstrate that her work has or will result in significant benefits beyond her own classroom, nor that she has exhibited any degree of influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-09-07_01_B5203; source_row=20643 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other37 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not provide objective comparative earnings data for those performing similar work at the top level of the field; the issue was not addressed on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not provide objective comparative earnings data for those performing similar work at the top level of the field; the issue was not addressed on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-31_01_B2203; source_row=20635 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Mentoring graduate students is not formal judging; the Petitioner provided no documentation of duties as a committee member or supervisory judging functions in the laboratory.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
Mentoring graduate students is not formal judging; the Petitioner provided no documentation of duties as a committee member or supervisory judging functions in the laboratory.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-31_01_B2203; source_row=20631 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Translations were not properly certified, the awarding entity was inconsistently identified, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Translations were not properly certified, the awarding entity was inconsistently identified, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-31_01_B2203; source_row=20630 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the title suggested a lead role, no duties were documented; the laboratory's distinguished reputation was not demonstrated by external evidence; committee role was undescribed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the title suggested a lead role, no duties were documented; the laboratory's distinguished reputation was not demonstrated by external evidence; committee role was undescribed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-31_01_B2203; source_row=20634 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other37 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence did not show that findings were adopted broadly or impacted the field; expert letters were generalized and unsupported; no patents were submitted; citation evidence was partially translated and unquantified.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The evidence did not show that findings were adopted broadly or impacted the field; expert letters were generalized and unsupported; no patents were submitted; citation evidence was partially translated and unquantified.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-31_01_B2203; source_row=20632 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c