Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17731–17740
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other100 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the article in the trade publication was not 'about' the Petitioner—it merely quoted him in one paragraph—and the Petitioner failed to corroborate the claimed national distribution of the publication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the article in the trade publication was not 'about' the Petitioner—it merely quoted him in one paragraph—and the Petitioner failed to corroborate the claimed national distribution of the publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-24_01_B2203; source_row=20586 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other100 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-24_01_B2203; source_row=20591 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other100 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record supports the appellate affirmations: a VP letter confirms the Petitioner's role as senior editor, deputy director of news, and general producer; the employer's program received accolades and media coverage establishing the company as a noted satellite television company.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record supports the appellate affirmations: a VP letter confirms the Petitioner's role as senior editor, deputy director of news, and general producer; the employer's program received accolades and media coverage establishing the company as a noted satellite television company.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-24_01_B2203; source_row=20590 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
Testimonial letters were largely conclusory and uncorroborated. For multiple organizations, the Petitioner failed to provide evidence of the role's duties, the organization's distinguished reputation, or both. USCIS need not accept primarily conclusory affirmations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Testimonial letters were largely conclusory and uncorroborated. For multiple organizations, the Petitioner failed to provide evidence of the role's duties, the organization's distinguished reputation, or both. USCIS need not accept primarily conclusory affirmations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-23_01_B2203; source_row=20567 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO considered this criterion sua sponte (via footnote). The contracts identified total fees but not the Petitioner's individual salary or remuneration, and no comparative data was provided to show the remuneration was high relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO considered this criterion sua sponte (via footnote). The contracts identified total fees but not the Petitioner's individual salary or remuneration, and no comparative data was provided to show the remuneration was high relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-23_01_B2203; source_row=20569 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
None of the three associations clearly required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The membership requirements were vague or based on general experience and professional titles, without specifying who judges applicants or providing examples of qualifying achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
None of the three associations clearly required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The membership requirements were vague or based on general experience and professional titles, without specifying who judges applicants or providing examples of qualifying achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-23_01_B2203; source_row=20564 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The publication appeared to be a catalog of architectural designs from various architects, not material about the Petitioner specifically. The Petitioner provided no information on readership or circulation, and his name appeared only among groups of designers with no discussion specifically about him or his work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The publication appeared to be a catalog of architectural designs from various architects, not material about the Petitioner specifically. The Petitioner provided no information on readership or circulation, and his name appeared only among groups of designers with no discussion specifically about him or his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-23_01_B2203; source_row=20565 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The exhibition selection was merely inclusion in a display of 644 works, not a nationally or internationally recognized award. The Petitioner himself conceded one honor was not nationally recognized. The publication listing appeared to be a catalog rather than an award. The Gold Award lacked evidence of award criteria, awarding entity, or national/international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The exhibition selection was merely inclusion in a display of 644 works, not a nationally or internationally recognized award. The Petitioner himself conceded one honor was not nationally recognized. The publication listing appeared to be a catalog rather than an award. The Gold Award lacked evidence of award criteria, awarding entity, or national/international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-23_01_B2203; source_row=20563 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
This criterion is specific to the performing arts and requires documentation such as box office receipts. As an architect, the Petitioner does not work in the performing arts, so this criterion is inapplicable.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
This criterion is specific to the performing arts and requires documentation such as box office receipts. As an architect, the Petitioner does not work in the performing arts, so this criterion is inapplicable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-23_01_B2203; source_row=20568 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The Petitioner's articles garnered only limited citations, reference letters spoke largely to future potential rather than current recognition, and media coverage was limited. His accomplishments showed he is an able researcher but not one at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The Petitioner's articles garnered only limited citations, reference letters spoke largely to future potential rather than current recognition, and media coverage was limited. His accomplishments showed he is an able researcher but not one at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-23_02_B2203; source_row=20576 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c