Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
Considering all evidence in aggregate — national awards, editorial board positions, and influential publications — AAO concluded the Petitioner demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Considering all evidence in aggregate — national awards, editorial board positions, and influential publications — AAO concluded the Petitioner demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-05_01_B2203; source_row=20525 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the contributions criterion met based on reference letters detailing specific project impacts (including a 15% improvement in network capacity), two national-level prizes, and notable citation counts in the aggregate.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the contributions criterion met based on reference letters detailing specific project impacts (including a 15% improvement in network capacity), two national-level prizes, and notable citation counts in the aggregate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-05_01_B2203; source_row=20522 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate a degree of influence beyond her immediate circle of colleagues. Letters from collaborators and independent practitioners contained largely conclusory praise without examples of adoption of her work, and the record lacked evidence that other institutions reviewed or implemented her telemedicine analysis or transplant desensitization work.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate a degree of influence beyond her immediate circle of colleagues. Letters from collaborators and independent practitioners contained largely conclusory praise without examples of adoption of her work, and the record lacked evidence that other institutions reviewed or implemented her telemedicine analysis or transplant desensitization work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-08-04_02_B5203; source_row=20519 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c