Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17841–17850
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the record supports the determination that the Petitioner meets the first NYSDOT prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record supports the determination that the Petitioner meets the first NYSDOT prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-28_01_B5203; source_row=20468 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the reference letters and frequent independent citations of the Petitioner's research demonstrated a degree of influence on the field, and that the past record of achievement justifies a projection of greater-than-U.S.-worker national-interest benefit.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the reference letters and frequent independent citations of the Petitioner's research demonstrated a degree of influence on the field, and that the past record of achievement justifies a projection of greater-than-U.S.-worker national-interest benefit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-28_01_B5203; source_row=20470 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the testimonial letters, while attesting to the Petitioner's expertise and collaborations, did not identify specific contributions with measurable impact on the field. Citation counts, including 152 citations to one article, were not supported by documentary evidence linking them to major significance, and the Petitioner's attempt to narrow the comparison group to a subset of researchers was rejected.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the testimonial letters, while attesting to the Petitioner's expertise and collaborations, did not identify specific contributions with measurable impact on the field. Citation counts, including 152 citations to one article, were not supported by documentary evidence linking them to major significance, and the Petitioner's attempt to narrow the comparison group to a subset of researchers was rejected.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-25_01_B2203; source_row=20466 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted that the record in aggregate does not establish the requisite level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted that the record in aggregate does not establish the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-25_01_B2203; source_row=20467 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record supports the director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion; he submitted documentation of completed peer review of seven manuscripts.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record supports the director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion; he submitted documentation of completed peer review of seven manuscripts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-25_01_B2203; source_row=20464 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted eight published articles in professional or major trade publications, and the record supports the director's finding that this criterion is met.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted eight published articles in professional or major trade publications, and the record supports the director's finding that this criterion is met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-25_01_B2203; source_row=20465 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree was conferred in June 2007, only post-June 2007 experience counts as post-baccalaureate. The Beneficiary claimed only 29 months of such experience, well short of the 60 months required by regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree was conferred in June 2007, only post-June 2007 experience counts as post-baccalaureate. The Beneficiary claimed only 29 months of such experience, well short of the 60 months required by regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-22_01_B5203; source_row=20458 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's qualifying experience for the offered position
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the record does not establish qualifying experience and noted that the Beneficiary's general-manager duties did not match those of the controller position.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record does not establish qualifying experience and noted that the Beneficiary's general-manager duties did not match those of the controller position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-22_02_B5203; source_row=20463 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c