Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found that photography is not a performing art and therefore this criterion does not apply. Even setting that aside, the documentation was insufficient: some certificates postdated the filing, sale amounts were nominal (~$1,097), and listings for sale do not evidence commercial success.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that photography is not a performing art and therefore this criterion does not apply. Even setting that aside, the documentation was insufficient: some certificates postdated the filing, sale amounts were nominal (~$1,097), and listings for sale do not evidence commercial success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-15_01_B2203; source_row=20453 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the photography quarterly is a professional publication, the entry focuses on the Petitioner's work, and the submission includes the required title, date, and author, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the photography quarterly is a professional publication, the entry focuses on the Petitioner's work, and the submission includes the required title, date, and author, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-15_01_B2203; source_row=20449 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO did not reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the record in aggregate would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the record in aggregate would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-15_01_B2203; source_row=20454 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Beneficiary graduated in 1994 from an institution that was not accredited until 2005. A foreign degree must be accredited by a comparable system of accreditation to qualify as the foreign equivalent of a U.S. advanced degree, so a pre-accreditation degree from that institution cannot qualify.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary graduated in 1994 from an institution that was not accredited until 2005. A foreign degree must be accredited by a comparable system of accreditation to qualify as the foreign equivalent of a U.S. advanced degree, so a pre-accreditation degree from that institution cannot qualify.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=20446 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not pay the full proffered wage in any of the relevant years (2013–2015), and did not submit required financial documentation (Form 990, annual reports, or audited financial statements) to otherwise establish ability to pay. The housing allowance could not be counted toward the offered wage. Magnitude of business activities evidence was also insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not pay the full proffered wage in any of the relevant years (2013–2015), and did not submit required financial documentation (Form 990, annual reports, or audited financial statements) to otherwise establish ability to pay. The housing allowance could not be counted toward the offered wage. Magnitude of business activities evidence was also insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=20445 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the consistent acclaim garnered by his projects, recognition that followed him across employers, and his role as judge and panelist established him as among the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the consistent acclaim garnered by his projects, recognition that followed him across employers, and his role as judge and panelist established him as among the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-06_01_B2203; source_row=20441 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO determined the article contained substantive information about the Petitioner and his work, and that the publication qualifies as major media with over 100 million monthly visits.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO determined the article contained substantive information about the Petitioner and his work, and that the publication qualifies as major media with over 100 million monthly visits.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-07-06_01_B2203; source_row=20438 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c