Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 17911–17920

EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences30 citations11 reviews

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed that the letter from the journal editor and the attached list of 11 reviewed manuscripts supports the finding that this criterion is met.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the letter from the journal editor and the attached list of 11 reviewed manuscripts supports the finding that this criterion is met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_01_B2203; source_row=20390
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences30 citations11 reviews

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the Petitioner did not submit copies of the articles as published, relying instead on text incorporated into her cover letter. The translations were not properly certified and did not identify the specific documents they accompanied. The RFE response provided only one article with an uncertified translation lacking author identification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner did not submit copies of the articles as published, relying instead on text incorporated into her cover letter. The translations were not properly certified and did not identify the specific documents they accompanied. The RFE response provided only one article with an uncertified translation lacking author identification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_01_B2203; source_row=20389
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

24 months qualifying experience per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO identified material inconsistencies: insurance documents listed a different employer entity than claimed for the first prior employer, and W-2s from a payroll company for the second prior employer period were not fully explained (the payroll contract was not signed until 2011 and did not cover 2010; the contract also showed shared employment control).…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO identified material inconsistencies: insurance documents listed a different employer entity than claimed for the first prior employer, and W-2s from a payroll company for the second prior employer period were not fully explained (the payroll contract was not signed until 2011 and did not cover 2010; the contract also showed shared employment control). These inconsistencies were unresolved and undermined the claimed experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_04_B5203; source_row=20401
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

bona fide job offer / realistic offer as of priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that requiring contract specifics was appropriate, citing Amsol. However, AAO still found the offer not bona fide because the Petitioner could not establish it had existing or projected projects for the offered position as of the labor certification filing date.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that requiring contract specifics was appropriate, citing Amsol. However, AAO still found the offer not bona fide because the Petitioner could not establish it had existing or projected projects for the offered position as of the labor certification filing date. The client statement covered a different position with different duties, and the H-1B contract salary was lower than the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_04_B5203; source_row=20398
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay – 2012

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that for 2012, the Petitioner's net current assets of $218,218 exceeded the amount owed to the Beneficiary in 2012, establishing ability to pay for that year.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that for 2012, the Petitioner's net current assets of $218,218 exceeded the amount owed to the Beneficiary in 2012, establishing ability to pay for that year.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_04_B5203; source_row=20399
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay – 2013 and 2014 (multiple beneficiaries)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner significantly underreported the number of beneficiaries with pending/approved I-140 petitions in 2013 and 2014 (9 vs. 5 reported in 2013; 19 vs. 7 reported in 2014). The 2015 withdrawals did not relieve the Petitioner of its obligations for prior years. Without proffered and actual wage data for all beneficiaries, ability to pay could not be assessed.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner significantly underreported the number of beneficiaries with pending/approved I-140 petitions in 2013 and 2014 (9 vs. 5 reported in 2013; 19 vs. 7 reported in 2014). The 2015 withdrawals did not relieve the Petitioner of its obligations for prior years. Without proffered and actual wage data for all beneficiaries, ability to pay could not be assessed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_04_B5203; source_row=20400
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date forward

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner significantly undercounted its pending I-140 obligations (9 petitions in 2013, not 2; 19 total including the Beneficiary in 2014, not 6). The record lacked wage data for all relevant beneficiaries, precluding a net income, net current assets, or Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner significantly undercounted its pending I-140 obligations (9 petitions in 2013, not 2; 19 total including the Beneficiary in 2014, not 6). The record lacked wage data for all relevant beneficiaries, precluding a net income, net current assets, or Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_02_B5203; source_row=20395
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Realistic bona fide job offer as of priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO disagreed with the Director's methodology (requiring specific future contracts from a staffing firm is unrealistic) but agreed on the outcome: the Petitioner failed to show existing or projected projects at the labor certification filing date that could support the offered position.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's methodology (requiring specific future contracts from a staffing firm is unrealistic) but agreed on the outcome: the Petitioner failed to show existing or projected projects at the labor certification filing date that could support the offered position. The vendor letter and professional services agreement either post-dated the priority date or showed employment at a lower wage under different duties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_02_B5203; source_row=20394
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Reliable documentation of claimed employment experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found documentation of two employment periods unreliable: (1) the letter for one employer made an unsubstantiated corporate identity assertion; (2) the claimed employment with the Petitioner's own company during 2011–2013 was contradicted by a vendor letter showing the Beneficiary was placed through a different entity, and a 2011 W-2 listed a co-employer as employer of record with shared control over key employment aspe…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found documentation of two employment periods unreliable: (1) the letter for one employer made an unsubstantiated corporate identity assertion; (2) the claimed employment with the Petitioner's own company during 2011–2013 was contradicted by a vendor letter showing the Beneficiary was placed through a different entity, and a 2011 W-2 listed a co-employer as employer of record with shared control over key employment aspects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_02_B5203; source_row=20397
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets minimum educational requirement on ETA Form 9089

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the Beneficiary does not meet the master's-in-physical-therapy requirement listed on ETA Form 9089. The credentialing organization's coursework-based equivalency does not produce a single foreign equivalent degree, and the U.S. five-year master's program comparators all require a bachelor's degree first and award graduate credentials.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Beneficiary does not meet the master's-in-physical-therapy requirement listed on ETA Form 9089. The credentialing organization's coursework-based equivalency does not produce a single foreign equivalent degree, and the U.S. five-year master's program comparators all require a bachelor's degree first and award graduate credentials.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-06-13_05_B5203; source_row=20403
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment