Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 17961–17970
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the substantial intrinsic merit of the proposed work was not in question.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the substantial intrinsic merit of the proposed work was not in question.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-25_02_B5203; source_row=20349 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters about the Petitioner's role as a team assistant did not describe how the position fit within the organization's hierarchy or how she impacted the company.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters about the Petitioner's role as a team assistant did not describe how the position fit within the organization's hierarchy or how she impacted the company.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-25_01_B2203; source_row=20341 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that her work as an individual teacher would have a nationally significant effect on any nationwide physics-teacher shortage, and noted NYSDOT specifically cited classroom teachers as lacking the requisite national scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that her work as an individual teacher would have a nationally significant effect on any nationwide physics-teacher shortage, and noted NYSDOT specifically cited classroom teachers as lacking the requisite national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-25_03_B5203; source_row=20353 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker (influence on the field)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the evidence showed positive local-level impact on the Petitioner's own students and school district but did not establish influence on the field of science or physics education generally; her certificates were not shown to indicate field-wide influence.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence showed positive local-level impact on the Petitioner's own students and school district but did not establish influence on the field of science or physics education generally; her certificates were not shown to indicate field-wide influence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-25_03_B5203; source_row=20354 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concurred. Translations were uncertified, the awards were for oil painting (not art directing), and even on the merits there was no evidence of national or international recognition. The 'collected and displayed' honor was not shown to be a specific prize or award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred. Translations were uncertified, the awards were for oil painting (not art directing), and even on the merits there was no evidence of national or international recognition. The 'collected and displayed' honor was not shown to be a specific prize or award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-19_02_B2203; source_row=20329 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO addressed it on de novo review and found no comparison evidence for the $36,000 salary and no certified evidence of any actual sale or remuneration; the certificate did not establish that the Beneficiary received money for the painting.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO addressed it on de novo review and found no comparison evidence for the $36,000 salary and no certified evidence of any actual sale or remuneration; the certificate did not establish that the Beneficiary received money for the painting.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-19_02_B2203; source_row=20334 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original artistic contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO independently found the criterion unmet. Letters were uncertified and gave no specific examples of contributions of major significance, evidence concerned oil painting rather than art directing, and reusing membership/awards evidence does not establish this separate criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO independently found the criterion unmet. Letters were uncertified and gave no specific examples of contributions of major significance, evidence concerned oil painting rather than art directing, and reusing membership/awards evidence does not establish this separate criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-05-19_02_B2203; source_row=20332 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c