Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Bona fide job opportunity clearly open to U.S. workers
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while many Modular Container factors favored the petitioner, the Beneficiary's status as one of a small group of employees, his active involvement in recruitment, and his status as the sole U.S.-based employee near the office collectively indicated he could influence hiring decisions and the job was not clearly open to U.S. workers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while many Modular Container factors favored the petitioner, the Beneficiary's status as one of a small group of employees, his active involvement in recruitment, and his status as the sole U.S.-based employee near the office collectively indicated he could influence hiring decisions and the job was not clearly open to U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-25_02_B5203; source_row=20296 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Willful misrepresentation of material fact on ETA Form 9089 Question C.9
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Beneficiary appeared to be a corporate officer, Question C.9 asks specifically about ownership interest or familial relationship, neither of which was evidenced in the record. Thus the 'No' answer was not a misrepresentation of the facts covered by that question.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Beneficiary appeared to be a corporate officer, Question C.9 asks specifically about ownership interest or familial relationship, neither of which was evidenced in the record. Thus the 'No' answer was not a misrepresentation of the facts covered by that question.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-25_02_B5203; source_row=20295 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
On appeal, the Petitioner submitted DOL Online Wage Library data showing Level 4 Computer and Information Research Scientists earn $120,016/year, while his W-2 forms showed compensation of ~$238,731 in 2014, nearly double the benchmark, satisfying the high salary criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On appeal, the Petitioner submitted DOL Online Wage Library data showing Level 4 Computer and Information Research Scientists earn $120,016/year, while his W-2 forms showed compensation of ~$238,731 in 2014, nearly double the benchmark, satisfying the high salary criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-25_01_B2203; source_row=20293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIPhD13 papers100 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the totality of evidence — citation impact, salary, peer-review quality, private-sector achievements including a proprietary risk management system that freed $90 million in risk capital and reduced runtime from 40 minutes to under 2 minutes, and reference letters from experts — established extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of evidence — citation impact, salary, peer-review quality, private-sector achievements including a proprietary risk management system that freed $90 million in risk capital and reduced runtime from 40 minutes to under 2 minutes, and reference letters from experts — established extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-25_01_B2203; source_row=20294 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serve national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's claimed unique qualifications (computer technology expertise, writing skills, nineteen years of experience, professional credentials, and 'highly effective' ratings) are insufficient because the inapplicability of labor certification cannot alone justify a national interest waiver; the Petitioner still must show he would serve the national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's claimed unique qualifications (computer technology expertise, writing skills, nineteen years of experience, professional credentials, and 'highly effective' ratings) are insufficient because the inapplicability of labor certification cannot alone justify a national interest waiver; the Petitioner still must show he would serve the national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_06_B5203; source_row=20287 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serving the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found no documentary evidence that the Petitioner's published and presented work had been frequently cited by independent scholars, that his proposals had been widely implemented, or that his work otherwise influenced the field of complexity leadership as a whole. Reference letters were conclusory, partially duplicative, and lacked specific examples of field-wide impact.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found no documentary evidence that the Petitioner's published and presented work had been frequently cited by independent scholars, that his proposals had been widely implemented, or that his work otherwise influenced the field of complexity leadership as a whole. Reference letters were conclusory, partially duplicative, and lacked specific examples of field-wide impact. Academic awards had only institutional significance, peer review activities were routine, and skills characterizing the Petitioner as 'unique' related to labor certification availability rather than national interest.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_07_B5203; source_row=20290 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's proposed non-profit foundation did not exist at the time of filing, no school systems have implemented the proposal, the foundation has received no financial grants, and new letters from government officials do not indicate intent to advance the proposal. Performance evaluations post-date the filing and cannot be used to establish eligibility.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's proposed non-profit foundation did not exist at the time of filing, no school systems have implemented the proposal, the foundation has received no financial grants, and new letters from government officials do not indicate intent to advance the proposal. Performance evaluations post-date the filing and cannot be used to establish eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-22_06_B5203; source_row=20286 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c