Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the letters did not explain whether the Petitioner was responsible for creating the practices or innovations adopted by others, and that no documentary evidence supported the adoption claims. AAO also rejected the argument that letters alone, absent credibility concerns, must be accepted as sufficient under the preponderance standard.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the letters did not explain whether the Petitioner was responsible for creating the practices or innovations adopted by others, and that no documentary evidence supported the adoption claims. AAO also rejected the argument that letters alone, absent credibility concerns, must be accepted as sufficient under the preponderance standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-19_01_B5203; source_row=20272 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
What the decision said
This prong was not at issue in the motion to reconsider; the prior AAO decision had found the Petitioner established advanced degree professional status, and the motion focused on the third NYSDOT prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
This prong was not at issue in the motion to reconsider; the prior AAO decision had found the Petitioner established advanced degree professional status, and the motion focused on the third NYSDOT prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-19_01_B5203; source_row=20270 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner claimed leading or critical roles in numerous organizations, but failed to demonstrate that the organizations had distinguished reputations, that his roles were truly leading or critical, or that several roles were even connected to his field of calligraphy. Evidence was also undermined by missing translations, uncertified translations, and self-serving statements without corroboration.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner claimed leading or critical roles in numerous organizations, but failed to demonstrate that the organizations had distinguished reputations, that his roles were truly leading or critical, or that several roles were even connected to his field of calligraphy. Evidence was also undermined by missing translations, uncertified translations, and self-serving statements without corroboration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-18_02_B2203; source_row=20256 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to provide evidence of what other calligraphers or artists earn for comparison purposes, and also failed to provide credible evidence of his own actual remuneration. Contracts were not supported by evidence of payment, Chinese-language documents lacked required translations, and several documents contained internal contradictions undermining their credibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to provide evidence of what other calligraphers or artists earn for comparison purposes, and also failed to provide credible evidence of his own actual remuneration. Contracts were not supported by evidence of payment, Chinese-language documents lacked required translations, and several documents contained internal contradictions undermining their credibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-18_02_B2203; source_row=20258 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Letters of recommendation were given limited weight due to lack of corroborating evidence for the credentials of the references and the bases for their opinions. Published works were not accompanied by required translations. Charity work certificates were unrelated to calligraphy contributions. Collection of works by prominent figures showed popularity but not contributions of major significance to the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Letters of recommendation were given limited weight due to lack of corroborating evidence for the credentials of the references and the bases for their opinions. Published works were not accompanied by required translations. Charity work certificates were unrelated to calligraphy contributions. Collection of works by prominent figures showed popularity but not contributions of major significance to the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-18_02_B2203; source_row=20257 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 'Member News' announcement of three sentences was not a scholarly article, and the dissertation was published after the petition's filing date, so it cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The 'Member News' announcement of three sentences was not a scholarly article, and the dissertation was published after the petition's filing date, so it cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-18_01_B2203; source_row=20250 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found unresolved discrepancies between two sets of paystubs showing different hire dates (January 22, 2007 vs. October 1, 2006), and a discrepancy between the final 2013 paystub ($42,955.05) and the W-2 ($42,792.03). The Petitioner did not explain why two contemporaneous sets of paystubs existed with different hire dates, and the payroll supervisor's letter did not address these issues.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found unresolved discrepancies between two sets of paystubs showing different hire dates (January 22, 2007 vs. October 1, 2006), and a discrepancy between the final 2013 paystub ($42,955.05) and the W-2 ($42,792.03). The Petitioner did not explain why two contemporaneous sets of paystubs existed with different hire dates, and the payroll supervisor's letter did not address these issues.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-18_01_B5203; source_row=20253 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Educational qualifications per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that USCIS must read the plain language of the labor certification, which required a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration or Marketing. The Beneficiary holds a BA in international affairs, and the Petitioner indicated at Line H.7 that no alternate field of study was acceptable. Job advertisements also confirmed only marketing and business administration degrees were advertised.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that USCIS must read the plain language of the labor certification, which required a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration or Marketing. The Beneficiary holds a BA in international affairs, and the Petitioner indicated at Line H.7 that no alternate field of study was acceptable. Job advertisements also confirmed only marketing and business administration degrees were advertised.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-18_01_B5203; source_row=20252 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c