Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18071–18080
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner abandoned this criterion on appeal by failing to raise it. Even if not abandoned, AAO would agree with the Director that the letters from his engineering employers did not describe a position consistent with a leading or critical role, nor establish the organizations' distinguished reputations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner abandoned this criterion on appeal by failing to raise it. Even if not abandoned, AAO would agree with the Director that the letters from his engineering employers did not describe a position consistent with a leading or critical role, nor establish the organizations' distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-06_01_B2203; source_row=20230 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The membership letter did not contain information about the requirements for acceptance or who made admissions decisions, so the Petitioner failed to show his membership satisfied the second or third elements of this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The membership letter did not contain information about the requirements for acceptance or who made admissions decisions, so the Petitioner failed to show his membership satisfied the second or third elements of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-06_01_B2203; source_row=20228 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO deferred analysis to the final merits determination, noting concerns about the significance of the awards evidence but not disturbing the Director's step-1 finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO deferred analysis to the final merits determination, noting concerns about the significance of the awards evidence but not disturbing the Director's step-1 finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-06_02_B2203; source_row=20233 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-04-06_01_B2203; source_row=20232 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO stated that no full final merits determination was required because the Petitioner failed the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated that no full final merits determination was required because the Petitioner failed the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-03-25_01_B2203; source_row=20226 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The submitted documentation did not indicate the Petitioner's book is a professional or major trade publication or other type of major media. The book appeared to be self-published with no sales evidence.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The submitted documentation did not indicate the Petitioner's book is a professional or major trade publication or other type of major media. The book appeared to be self-published with no sales evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-03-25_01_B2203; source_row=20225 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's book and invention lacked documentary evidence of major impact or frequent citation by independent researchers. The supporting letter offered only generalized conclusory assertions without specific examples of major significance. The personal statement on certification was similarly unsubstantiated.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's book and invention lacked documentary evidence of major impact or frequent citation by independent researchers. The supporting letter offered only generalized conclusory assertions without specific examples of major significance. The personal statement on certification was similarly unsubstantiated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-03-25_01_B2203; source_row=20224 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record lacked any letters from prospective employers, contracts, or a sufficiently detailed personal statement of plans. AAO upheld the Director's determination on this issue.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked any letters from prospective employers, contracts, or a sufficiently detailed personal statement of plans. AAO upheld the Director's determination on this issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-03-25_01_B2203; source_row=20227 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c