Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18161–18170

EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

What the decision said

AAO found the Petitioner abandoned this criterion because she did not assert it in her RFE response or on appeal. The record also lacked corroboration of her hierarchical position, specific impact, or employers' distinguished reputations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner abandoned this criterion because she did not assert it in her RFE response or on appeal. The record also lacked corroboration of her hierarchical position, specific impact, or employers' distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-19_02_B2203; source_row=20140
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary qualifying experience per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO raised this issue independently beyond the Director's decision. The letters lacked direct personal knowledge for the earlier period, lacked independent corroboration of company dissolution, raised concerns about a possible family relationship between one signatory and the Beneficiary, and the described duties did not match the offered job requirements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue independently beyond the Director's decision. The letters lacked direct personal knowledge for the earlier period, lacked independent corroboration of company dissolution, raised concerns about a possible family relationship between one signatory and the Beneficiary, and the described duties did not match the offered job requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-16_04_B5203; source_row=20136
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that net income in both years was insufficient, net current assets in 2013-14 did not cover the full annual proffered wage, and refused to prorate the wage. The Sonegawa totality factors also did not favor the Petitioner as there were no uncharacteristic losses, no documented industry reputation, and no showing that employing the Beneficiary would replace existing consulting costs.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that net income in both years was insufficient, net current assets in 2013-14 did not cover the full annual proffered wage, and refused to prorate the wage. The Sonegawa totality factors also did not favor the Petitioner as there were no uncharacteristic losses, no documented industry reputation, and no showing that employing the Beneficiary would replace existing consulting costs.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-16_04_B5203; source_row=20135
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay based on LLC contractual obligation under management services agreement

Why AAO was not persuaded

The management services agreement was undated and bore an effective date of January 1, 2004, yet online records showed the LLC was not formed until April 20, 2006, casting doubt on its authenticity. Additionally, the LLC's Schedule K-1 showed the petitioner owned only 1% of the LLC rather than 100% as claimed.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The management services agreement was undated and bore an effective date of January 1, 2004, yet online records showed the LLC was not formed until April 20, 2006, casting doubt on its authenticity. Additionally, the LLC's Schedule K-1 showed the petitioner owned only 1% of the LLC rather than 100% as claimed. These inconsistencies, viewed under Matter of Ho, undermined the claim that the LLC was legally obligated to fund the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-16_03_B5203; source_row=20133
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay based on totality of circumstances (Sonegawa factors)

Why AAO was not persuaded

Unlike Sonegawa, the record contained only one year of tax returns, no evidence of uncharacteristic losses, and no evidence the beneficiary would replace an existing employee or outsourced service. The growth suggested by the petitioner's evidence appeared attributable to the LLC rather than the petitioner itself.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Unlike Sonegawa, the record contained only one year of tax returns, no evidence of uncharacteristic losses, and no evidence the beneficiary would replace an existing employee or outsourced service. The growth suggested by the petitioner's evidence appeared attributable to the LLC rather than the petitioner itself.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-16_03_B5203; source_row=20134
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay based on bank account statements of related LLC

Why AAO was not persuaded

The bank account statements bore the name of a separate LLC, not the petitioner. Counsel's assertion that the petitioner had access to the account was unsupported by evidence and therefore insufficient to establish ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The bank account statements bore the name of a separate LLC, not the petitioner. Counsel's assertion that the petitioner had access to the account was unsupported by evidence and therefore insufficient to establish ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-16_03_B5203; source_row=20132
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay based on net income and net current assets

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's 2013 tax return showed net income of negative $52,897 and net current assets of negative $85,649; both figures are negative and thus cannot establish ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2013 tax return showed net income of negative $52,897 and net current assets of negative $85,649; both figures are negative and thus cannot establish ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-16_03_B5203; source_row=20131
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay based on wages paid to beneficiary

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found the director erred by comparing full-year wages to a one-month prorated wage. On a proper prorated basis, estimated monthly wages to the beneficiary (~$7,041) fell short of the prorated monthly wage ($9,072.25). The 2014 W-2 amount of $9,451.24 was unverifiable as a one-month wage and, even if accepted, a single month of wages is insufficient to assess continuing ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found the director erred by comparing full-year wages to a one-month prorated wage. On a proper prorated basis, estimated monthly wages to the beneficiary (~$7,041) fell short of the prorated monthly wage ($9,072.25). The 2014 W-2 amount of $9,451.24 was unverifiable as a one-month wage and, even if accepted, a single month of wages is insufficient to assess continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-16_03_B5203; source_row=20130
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner's published work, conference presentations, limited citation record (only three independent citations), reference letters, and small grant did not demonstrate that her contributions influenced the field as a whole. Reference letters were found to be conclusory and uncorroborated. Future impact claims and evidence of a physician shortage were also deemed insufficient.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's published work, conference presentations, limited citation record (only three independent citations), reference letters, and small grant did not demonstrate that her contributions influenced the field as a whole. Reference letters were found to be conclusory and uncorroborated. Future impact claims and evidence of a physician shortage were also deemed insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-12_01_B5203; source_row=20129
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO reversed the director, finding that cardiology research is disseminated to other physicians through conferences and medical journals, and thus the prospective benefit of the Petitioner's work is national in scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the director, finding that cardiology research is disseminated to other physicians through conferences and medical journals, and thus the prospective benefit of the Petitioner's work is national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-12_01_B5203; source_row=20128
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment