Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18211–18220

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed, finding the Petitioner's world record set the bar to which others will aspire.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed, finding the Petitioner's world record set the bar to which others will aspire.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=20079
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found Petitioner played a critical role at a circus organization with a distinguished reputation, given his prominence in promotional materials, his record-breaking television appearance, and the importance of his act to the organization's success.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found Petitioner played a critical role at a circus organization with a distinguished reputation, given his prominence in promotional materials, his record-breaking television appearance, and the importance of his act to the organization's success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=20080
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the aggregate evidence—including leadership of a high-circulation publication, two significant national awards with media coverage, an encyclopedic book widely cited by students and professionals, advisory input to Nepal's Finance Minister, and high relative salary—demonstrated the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field with sustained national acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the aggregate evidence—including leadership of a high-circulation publication, two significant national awards with media coverage, an encyclopedic book widely cited by students and professionals, advisory input to Nepal's Finance Minister, and high relative salary—demonstrated the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field with sustained national acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=20085
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or remuneration

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's salary of 75,000 Rs. per month compared to the statutory minimum of 14,000 Rs. and salaries of other editors confirmed he commanded significantly high remuneration relative to others in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's salary of 75,000 Rs. per month compared to the statutory minimum of 14,000 Rs. and salaries of other editors confirmed he commanded significantly high remuneration relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=20084
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's role as repeatedly invited trainer and appointed coordinator for a distinguished journalism organization in Nepal satisfied this criterion, supported by letters and news articles about his training sessions.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's role as repeatedly invited trainer and appointed coordinator for a distinguished journalism organization in Nepal satisfied this criterion, supported by letters and news articles about his training sessions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=20083
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's role as editor-in-chief reviewing and making final publication decisions, and his service on a prize section committee evaluating 102 reports, satisfied this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's role as editor-in-chief reviewing and making final publication decisions, and his service on a prize section committee evaluating 102 reports, satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=20082
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AIMaster’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Advanced degree qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that a degree from an unaccredited institution lacks the academic weight necessary to qualify as an advanced degree. WASC records confirm the institution was not accredited during the Beneficiary's enrollment (2008–2010), only receiving accreditation in 2012.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that a degree from an unaccredited institution lacks the academic weight necessary to qualify as an advanced degree. WASC records confirm the institution was not accredited during the Beneficiary's enrollment (2008–2010), only receiving accreditation in 2012. State BPPE approval is a lower standard than DOE/CHEA-recognized accreditation, and ICE/SEVP authorization to enroll foreign students is unrelated to immigrant classification requirements. The credentials evaluator's opinion was given little weight because it ignored the accreditation issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-04_01_B5203; source_row=20071
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Possession of advanced degree or foreign equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the beneficiary's official records do not show a master's degree was conferred. The credential evaluation, while asserting equivalency, does not claim the degree was actually received. Under both pathways of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i), an actual degree (or foreign equivalent) is required. No evidence of five or more years of post-baccalaureate experience was submitted for the alternative pathway.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the beneficiary's official records do not show a master's degree was conferred. The credential evaluation, while asserting equivalency, does not claim the degree was actually received. Under both pathways of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i), an actual degree (or foreign equivalent) is required. No evidence of five or more years of post-baccalaureate experience was submitted for the alternative pathway.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-04_03_B5203; source_row=20076
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification minimum requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Because the master's degree does not qualify as an advanced degree and no alternative combination of education and experience is permitted under the labor certification, the Beneficiary fails to satisfy the minimum educational requirement of the labor certification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Because the master's degree does not qualify as an advanced degree and no alternative combination of education and experience is permitted under the labor certification, the Beneficiary fails to satisfy the minimum educational requirement of the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-04_01_B5203; source_row=20072
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay based on actual compensation paid to beneficiary

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Beneficiary's 2014 W-2 showed $73,402.95 versus the proffered wage of $84,937, a shortfall of $11,534.05. Projected 2015 pay of $77,766 also fell short by $7,171. The Petitioner did not pay the beneficiary at least the proffered wage.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's 2014 W-2 showed $73,402.95 versus the proffered wage of $84,937, a shortfall of $11,534.05. Projected 2015 pay of $77,766 also fell short by $7,171. The Petitioner did not pay the beneficiary at least the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2016-02-04_02_B5203; source_row=20073
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment