Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 1821–1830
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics5 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner demonstrated both the substantial merit and national importance of his proposed endeavor, noting that his study of radioactive decay has applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner demonstrated both the substantial merit and national importance of his proposed endeavor, noting that his study of radioactive decay has applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-20_01_B5203; source_row=42452 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's evidence too general and lacking in specifics about how her proposed consulting and research work would produce broader impact on the laser dentistry field, healthcare industry, or U.S. economy at a national level. Her reliance on field-level importance, professional experience, and vague assertions was insufficient.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's evidence too general and lacking in specifics about how her proposed consulting and research work would produce broader impact on the laser dentistry field, healthcare industry, or U.S. economy at a national level. Her reliance on field-level importance, professional experience, and vague assertions was insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-20_07_B5203; source_row=42480 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO reserved review of the second and third Dhanasar prongs because the first prong was not met. Similarly, the underlying EB-2 classification was not adjudicated.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved review of the second and third Dhanasar prongs because the first prong was not met. Similarly, the underlying EB-2 classification was not adjudicated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-20_04_B5203; source_row=42475 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach this criterion because even if the Petitioner satisfied it, he could not numerically meet the requirement of at least three criteria given AAO's findings on criteria v and vi.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because even if the Petitioner satisfied it, he could not numerically meet the requirement of at least three criteria given AAO's findings on criteria v and vi.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-20_01_B2203; source_row=42451 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license to practice the profession or certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding, holding that the regulatory definition of 'profession' requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent as the minimum entry requirement, and the Petitioner had not shown that the occupation of physical therapy assistant meets that threshold.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding, holding that the regulatory definition of 'profession' requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent as the minimum entry requirement, and the Petitioner had not shown that the occupation of physical therapy assistant meets that threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-20_02_B5203; source_row=42463 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
What the decision said
The AAO reserved its opinion on criterion (F) because even if it found this criterion met, the Petitioner still could not satisfy at least three of the six criteria, making a ruling unnecessary. The AAO noted it would consider the evidence in the final merits determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved its opinion on criterion (F) because even if it found this criterion met, the Petitioner still could not satisfy at least three of the six criteria, making a ruling unnecessary. The AAO noted it would consider the evidence in the final merits determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-20_02_B5203; source_row=42466 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found numerous unresolved inconsistencies regarding the Petitioner's employment history, including contradictions between claimed full-time hours and actual earnings, conflicting start dates, and overlapping employment claims. Even setting aside those discrepancies, the letters confirming her employment did not demonstrate full-time hours, and some experience did not qualify as work in the occupation sought.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found numerous unresolved inconsistencies regarding the Petitioner's employment history, including contradictions between claimed full-time hours and actual earnings, conflicting start dates, and overlapping employment claims. Even setting aside those discrepancies, the letters confirming her employment did not demonstrate full-time hours, and some experience did not qualify as work in the occupation sought.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-20_02_B5203; source_row=42462 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c