Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18311–18320
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that 65 citations spread across at least eight works (with the most cited article receiving only 21 cites) was insufficient to show major significance, the media coverage did not specifically identify the Petitioner, and the expert letters did not identify specific contributions of major significance but merely relied on publication acceptance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that 65 citations spread across at least eight works (with the most cited article receiving only 21 cites) was insufficient to show major significance, the media coverage did not specifically identify the Petitioner, and the expert letters did not identify specific contributions of major significance but merely relied on publication acceptance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_02_B2203; source_row=19973 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination, finding that presenting an analysis of articles at a journal club meeting does not constitute formal participation 'as a judge' under the plain language of the criterion, and no peer review letters from journals were in the record.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination, finding that presenting an analysis of articles at a journal club meeting does not constitute formal participation 'as a judge' under the plain language of the criterion, and no peer review letters from journals were in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_02_B2203; source_row=19972 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
What the decision said
The Petitioner initially relied on conference presentations as comparable evidence under this criterion but did not maintain the argument on appeal, so AAO treated it as abandoned.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner initially relied on conference presentations as comparable evidence under this criterion but did not maintain the argument on appeal, so AAO treated it as abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_02_B2203; source_row=19975 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's findings for this criterion on appeal and offered no additional discussion, so AAO treated it as abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's findings for this criterion on appeal and offered no additional discussion, so AAO treated it as abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_02_B2203; source_row=19976 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
authorship of scholarly articles
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed the Director's finding, noting the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence including a published article to establish she meets this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding, noting the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence including a published article to establish she meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_02_B2203; source_row=19974 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's performances and teaching activities were confined to local and regional communities in the northeastern United States and did not translate into national benefits. Her music teaching was analogous to NYSDOT's example of a single schoolteacher whose impact would not be national in scope. Her unpublished decision arguments were unsupported by documentary evidence.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's performances and teaching activities were confined to local and regional communities in the northeastern United States and did not translate into national benefits. Her music teaching was analogous to NYSDOT's example of a single schoolteacher whose impact would not be national in scope. Her unpublished decision arguments were unsupported by documentary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_01_B5203; source_row=19970 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serving the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the reference letters, while praising the Petitioner's talent and community contributions, did not demonstrate influence on the field as a whole. Media coverage was local, recording sales figures were absent, and assertions of national influence were conclusory and uncorroborated. The DHS memorandum focused on inventors and researchers, not performing artists.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the reference letters, while praising the Petitioner's talent and community contributions, did not demonstrate influence on the field as a whole. Media coverage was local, recording sales figures were absent, and assertions of national influence were conclusory and uncorroborated. The DHS memorandum focused on inventors and researchers, not performing artists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_01_B5203; source_row=19971 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's work as a singer, voice teacher, musical director, conductor, arranger, and producer is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's work as a singer, voice teacher, musical director, conductor, arranger, and producer is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-21_01_B5203; source_row=19969 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Participation in a discussion event does not constitute a contribution of major significance without evidence of articulable impact on the field. Student letters confirm teaching quality but do not demonstrate contributions impacting the field as a whole beyond the Petitioner's own students.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Participation in a discussion event does not constitute a contribution of major significance without evidence of articulable impact on the field. Student letters confirm teaching quality but do not demonstrate contributions impacting the field as a whole beyond the Petitioner's own students.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-16_01_B2203; source_row=19960 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c