Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18351–18360

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Qualifying experience at third employer (university/medical center project)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record contained numerous unexplained inconsistencies regarding the Beneficiary's actual employer and the full-time or part-time nature of the work from June 1, 2007 to August 10, 2008. Letters from the dean were internally inconsistent on the employment period, and other documents suggested a different employer than stated on the labor certification.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record contained numerous unexplained inconsistencies regarding the Beneficiary's actual employer and the full-time or part-time nature of the work from June 1, 2007 to August 10, 2008. Letters from the dean were internally inconsistent on the employment period, and other documents suggested a different employer than stated on the labor certification. The Petitioner's own letter contradicted the labor certification by describing full-time rather than part-time employment. The record also did not explain how the Beneficiary could have worked full-time while simultaneously enrolled in graduate programs.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-07_01_B5203; source_row=19935
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Qualifying experience at first employer

Why the evidence was persuasive

A second letter from a director at the health system confirmed the Beneficiary's full-time employment as a programmer-analyst 2, resolving the deficiency noted in the RFE regarding the first letter. The record established approximately 26 months of full-time qualifying experience at this employer.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
A second letter from a director at the health system confirmed the Beneficiary's full-time employment as a programmer-analyst 2, resolving the deficiency noted in the RFE regarding the first letter. The record established approximately 26 months of full-time qualifying experience at this employer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-07_01_B5203; source_row=19933
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification educational requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

USCIS must read the labor certification's plain language, which required a bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent and precluded alternate combinations of education and experience. The beneficiary's associate membership certificate is not a degree from a college or university and therefore does not meet the stated requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
USCIS must read the labor certification's plain language, which required a bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent and precluded alternate combinations of education and experience. The beneficiary's associate membership certificate is not a degree from a college or university and therefore does not meet the stated requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-07_02_B5203; source_row=19937
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that reference letters were conclusory or lacked specific examples of field-wide impact; published case reports lacked citation evidence showing influence; peer review participation and conference presentations were routine and insufficient to demonstrate national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker; and clinical skills relate to the labor certification process rather than the NIW inquiry.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that reference letters were conclusory or lacked specific examples of field-wide impact; published case reports lacked citation evidence showing influence; peer review participation and conference presentations were routine and insufficient to demonstrate national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker; and clinical skills relate to the labor certification process rather than the NIW inquiry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-04_01_B5203; source_row=19929
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhysicianMaster’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO rejected the petitioner's argument that the third prong does not apply to self-petitioners, citing NYSDOT footnote 5. AAO found the letters and evidence did not demonstrate how the petitioner's findings specifically impacted his field—letters noted his past studies but did not describe their subsequent impact, and praised innovative research without showing it widely influenced farming practices or other researchers.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the petitioner's argument that the third prong does not apply to self-petitioners, citing NYSDOT footnote 5. AAO found the letters and evidence did not demonstrate how the petitioner's findings specifically impacted his field—letters noted his past studies but did not describe their subsequent impact, and praised innovative research without showing it widely influenced farming practices or other researchers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-04_02_B5203; source_row=19932
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO explicitly stated that the Petitioner established his work as a physician is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly stated that the Petitioner established his work as a physician is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-04_01_B5203; source_row=19927
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO explicitly stated that the proposed benefits of the Petitioner's hematology and oncology research would be national in scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly stated that the proposed benefits of the Petitioner's hematology and oncology research would be national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-04_01_B5203; source_row=19928
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhysicianMaster’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

What the decision said

Neither the Director nor the AAO separately addressed the first prong; the denial and affirmance focused on the third prong.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
Neither the Director nor the AAO separately addressed the first prong; the denial and affirmance focused on the third prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-04_02_B5203; source_row=19930
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhysicianMaster’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

What the decision said

Neither the Director nor the AAO separately addressed the second prong.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
Neither the Director nor the AAO separately addressed the second prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-04_02_B5203; source_row=19931
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

exceptional salary or remuneration

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of the Beneficiary's exceptional salary relative to prevailing wages.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of the Beneficiary's exceptional salary relative to prevailing wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-12-01_01_B5203; source_row=19924
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment