Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 1831–1840
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · EB-2 baseline
advanced degree or equivalent (5-year post-baccalaureate progressive experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, noting that the employer letters only documented experience through 2019 — predating the Petitioner's 2022 bachelor's degree — so no post-baccalaureate experience was established. The letters also lacked required duty descriptions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, noting that the employer letters only documented experience through 2019 — predating the Petitioner's 2022 bachelor's degree — so no post-baccalaureate experience was established. The letters also lacked required duty descriptions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_07_B5203; source_row=42444 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the evidence established the substantial merit of providing mobile dialysis services but not national importance, finding that the Petitioner's plans lacked specific demonstration of broader implications in the field, sufficient economic impact, or meaningful expansion of mobile medical centers at a national level.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the evidence established the substantial merit of providing mobile dialysis services but not national importance, finding that the Petitioner's plans lacked specific demonstration of broader implications in the field, sufficient economic impact, or meaningful expansion of mobile medical centers at a national level. The expert letter was also given little probative value for failing to provide specific examples of broader field impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_07_B5203; source_row=42441 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has substantial merit as a military chaplain providing religious services, but not national importance. The alleged shortage of chaplains does not render the endeavor nationally important, as shortages are addressed through the labor certification process.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has substantial merit as a military chaplain providing religious services, but not national importance. The alleged shortage of chaplains does not render the endeavor nationally important, as shortages are addressed through the labor certification process. The Petitioner's evidence showed importance of the field rather than the specific endeavor's prospective impact at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_04_B5203; source_row=42438 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that general industry-level reports and expert letters praising the Petitioner's skills did not speak to the specific prospective national impact of his individual endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that general industry-level reports and expert letters praising the Petitioner's skills did not speak to the specific prospective national impact of his individual endeavor. His plan to operate a single architecture firm was too broad and vague to demonstrate national importance, and he failed to show how his firm's projects would rise to the level of substantial positive economic effects contemplated by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_08_B5203; source_row=42445 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's post-initial-filing submissions were material changes and considered only the initial petition evidence. AAO found that the Petitioner's description of her endeavor was too vague — she did not specify whether she would work as an employee, consultant, or business owner, did not identify specific clients or partners, and did not provide an operational plan, timeline, or quantifiable metrics,…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's post-initial-filing submissions were material changes and considered only the initial petition evidence. AAO found that the Petitioner's description of her endeavor was too vague — she did not specify whether she would work as an employee, consultant, or business owner, did not identify specific clients or partners, and did not provide an operational plan, timeline, or quantifiable metrics, making it impossible to conclude the endeavor has national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_01_B5203; source_row=42428 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the Petitioner failed to show it has national importance. The general assertions in his professional plans lacked probative detail and corroboration, the letters and articles did not address the specific services or plans with sufficient specificity, and the Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of the scale or mechanism of any potential economic impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the Petitioner failed to show it has national importance. The general assertions in his professional plans lacked probative detail and corroboration, the letters and articles did not address the specific services or plans with sufficient specificity, and the Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of the scale or mechanism of any potential economic impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_03_B5203; source_row=42434 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's detailed decision, finding that the record lacked specific, objective, and probative evidence that the proposed company work would have broader implications beyond her employer and its clientele. The evidence submitted primarily demonstrated the value of her qualifications and profession rather than the national importance of her specific proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's detailed decision, finding that the record lacked specific, objective, and probative evidence that the proposed company work would have broader implications beyond her employer and its clientele. The evidence submitted primarily demonstrated the value of her qualifications and profession rather than the national importance of her specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_02_B5203; source_row=42431 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), an advanced degree includes a foreign equivalent degree above a bachelor's degree, and the Petitioner's Austrian doctoral degree qualifies as such based on the AACRAO EDGE database confirming its U.S. equivalency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), an advanced degree includes a foreign equivalent degree above a bachelor's degree, and the Petitioner's Austrian doctoral degree qualifies as such based on the AACRAO EDGE database confirming its U.S. equivalency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-19_04_B5203; source_row=42437 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c