Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Participation as a judge of the work of others in the same or allied field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reversed the Director, finding no documentary evidence of actual participation as a judge after earning qualifications. Referee photographs showed no indication of judging work. The affidavit was unsubstantiated, and there was no evidence that serving as a referee equates to judging the competitors' work rather than merely enforcing rules.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director, finding no documentary evidence of actual participation as a judge after earning qualifications. Referee photographs showed no indication of judging work. The affidavit was unsubstantiated, and there was no evidence that serving as a referee equates to judging the competitors' work rather than merely enforcing rules.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_01_B2203; source_row=19853 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reversed the Director, finding that the Petitioner's medals and certificates were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. A kickboxing competition being open to athletes from a country does not alone establish national or international recognition of its awards, and the evidence did not show recognition beyond the events themselves.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director, finding that the Petitioner's medals and certificates were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. A kickboxing competition being open to athletes from a country does not alone establish national or international recognition of its awards, and the evidence did not show recognition beyond the events themselves.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_01_B2203; source_row=19850 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO noted the step-1 threshold was not met so full final merits determination was unnecessary, but reviewed the aggregate evidence and found it did not show the requisite level of sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the step-1 threshold was not met so full final merits determination was unnecessary, but reviewed the aggregate evidence and found it did not show the requisite level of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_01_B2203; source_row=19856 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Support letters were conclusory and did not identify specific contributions or their impact on the field. DVD sales showed commercial success but not major significance. Social media followers were insufficient to demonstrate field-level impact. Evidence of use by a few coaches did not demonstrate substantial impact on the broader field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Support letters were conclusory and did not identify specific contributions or their impact on the field. DVD sales showed commercial success but not major significance. Social media followers were insufficient to demonstrate field-level impact. Evidence of use by a few coaches did not demonstrate substantial impact on the broader field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_01_B2203; source_row=19854 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
An educational scholarship awarded based on academic achievements or professional excellence does not constitute recognition of excellence in the field, and an arbitration panel appointment is not a prize or award under the plain language of the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
An educational scholarship awarded based on academic achievements or professional excellence does not constitute recognition of excellence in the field, and an arbitration panel appointment is not a prize or award under the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_02_B2203; source_row=19857 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The press release was not from a major media outlet and lacked an identified author; the local publications were not shown to be major media; and the articles in major media were about the dispute resolution mechanism, not about the Petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The press release was not from a major media outlet and lacked an identified author; the local publications were not shown to be major media; and the articles in major media were about the dispute resolution mechanism, not about the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_02_B2203; source_row=19859 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not document the impact of her arbitration decisions or research contributions on the field as a whole, and reference letters contained conclusory affirmations without supporting evidence of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not document the impact of her arbitration decisions or research contributions on the field as a whole, and reference letters contained conclusory affirmations without supporting evidence of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_02_B2203; source_row=19861 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found persuasive evidence that the Petitioner served as president of an arbitration panel, directed a multidisciplinary team on a major funded project, and was one of three arbitrators on another panel, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found persuasive evidence that the Petitioner served as president of an arbitration panel, directed a multidisciplinary team on a major funded project, and was one of three arbitrators on another panel, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-17_02_B2203; source_row=19862 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c