Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Beneficiary's qualifying experience per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO raised this issue sua sponte beyond the Director's decision. The Beneficiary's 55 months with the Petitioner were disqualified as substantially comparable experience under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i).…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte beyond the Director's decision. The Beneficiary's 55 months with the Petitioner were disqualified as substantially comparable experience under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i). The only remaining qualifying experience source—prior Indian employment—was undermined by two contradictory letters with identical dates and apparent font-size alterations suggesting document manipulation, leaving the Beneficiary's claimed experience unestablished.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-10_02_B5203; source_row=19842 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The amended returns, prepared by a new CPA and found reliable by AAO, showed net income exceeding the annual difference between the proffered wage ($120,016) and wages actually paid to the Beneficiary ($81,739.89 in 2013 and $90,312.86 in 2014), so the individual wage differential was met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The amended returns, prepared by a new CPA and found reliable by AAO, showed net income exceeding the annual difference between the proffered wage ($120,016) and wages actually paid to the Beneficiary ($81,739.89 in 2013 and $90,312.86 in 2014), so the individual wage differential was met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-10_02_B5203; source_row=19840 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay combined proffered wages of multiple pending petitions
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner had at least 58 other pending I-140 petitions after the priority date and the Petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence that the other beneficiaries no longer worked for it.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had at least 58 other pending I-140 petitions after the priority date and the Petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence that the other beneficiaries no longer worked for it. Even accepting only the 25 beneficiaries the Petitioner identified, the combined wage differentials ($439,859.98 in 2013 and $510,263.76 in 2014) far exceeded the Petitioner's net income, and Sonegawa factors did not support an exception.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-10_02_B5203; source_row=19841 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
Why the evidence was persuasive
The totality of evidence—including prestigious advertising awards, recognition in major trade publications as a top campaign of the century, work at leading international design firms, and numerous expert reference letters attesting to the Beneficiary's top status—established sustained national/international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the Experience Design field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The totality of evidence—including prestigious advertising awards, recognition in major trade publications as a top campaign of the century, work at leading international design firms, and numerous expert reference letters attesting to the Beneficiary's top status—established sustained national/international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the Experience Design field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-09_01_B2203; source_row=19837 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original contributions of major significance in the field
Why the evidence was persuasive
Published materials confirmed the advertising campaign significantly impacted the field, being named a top campaign of the 21st century by major trade publications. The Beneficiary was directly responsible for the campaign's most innovative and recognized interactive/integrated aspects.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Published materials confirmed the advertising campaign significantly impacted the field, being named a top campaign of the 21st century by major trade publications. The Beneficiary was directly responsible for the campaign's most innovative and recognized interactive/integrated aspects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-09_01_B2203; source_row=19835 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the awards were nationally/internationally recognized prizes in advertising and, on a case-by-case basis, determined the Beneficiary was so inextricably linked to the awarded campaign that he was recognized in the field as a de facto honoree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the awards were nationally/internationally recognized prizes in advertising and, on a case-by-case basis, determined the Beneficiary was so inextricably linked to the awarded campaign that he was recognized in the field as a de facto honoree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-09_01_B2203; source_row=19834 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record confirmed the Petitioner agency has a distinguished reputation, having won top industry honors and been named one of the top agencies. The Beneficiary, as Creative Director, was directly responsible for some of the agency's most successful product innovations and helped win numerous prestigious awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record confirmed the Petitioner agency has a distinguished reputation, having won top industry honors and been named one of the top agencies. The Beneficiary, as Creative Director, was directly responsible for some of the agency's most successful product innovations and helped win numerous prestigious awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-09_01_B2203; source_row=19836 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c