Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO reviewed the entire record and concluded the Beneficiary more likely than not possessed all required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the entire record and concluded the Beneficiary more likely than not possessed all required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-05_01_B5203; source_row=19819 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other27 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO rejected the Petitioner's argument that the final merits step does not apply to one-time achievement cases, holding that a final merits determination is required regardless of how the evidentiary threshold is met.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the Petitioner's argument that the final merits step does not apply to one-time achievement cases, holding that a final merits determination is required regardless of how the evidentiary threshold is met. AAO then found that the Petitioner had not shown sustained acclaim: she had no demonstrable activity in dance for nearly a decade before filing, reference letters described achievements from at least ten years prior, and her recent career had transitioned to Pilates.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-04_01_B2203; source_row=19815 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner appeared twice at a televised event featuring chosen performers in a variety of art forms and genres, constituting a display of her work in an artistic exhibition or showcase.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner appeared twice at a televised event featuring chosen performers in a variety of art forms and genres, constituting a display of her work in an artistic exhibition or showcase.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-04_01_B2203; source_row=19813 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Petitioner failed to show sustained acclaim or intent to work in dance, AAO concluded she had not established that her entry would prospectively benefit the United States.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to show sustained acclaim or intent to work in dance, AAO concluded she had not established that her entry would prospectively benefit the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-04_01_B2203; source_row=19817 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Intent to continue working in area of extraordinary ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's cover letters and record showed intent to work as a dance instructor and Pilates instructor rather than a dancer; the email reproductions were not true copies and failed to meet evidentiary requirements; and the totality of the record showed she had purposefully transitioned away from dance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's cover letters and record showed intent to work as a dance instructor and Pilates instructor rather than a dancer; the email reproductions were not true copies and failed to meet evidentiary requirements; and the totality of the record showed she had purposefully transitioned away from dance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-04_01_B2203; source_row=19816 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other27 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Director and AAO found the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Director and AAO found the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-04_01_B2203; source_row=19814 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other10 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
What the decision said
The AAO's analysis focused exclusively on the third NYSDOT prong (national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker) and did not separately address the first prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO's analysis focused exclusively on the third NYSDOT prong (national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker) and did not separately address the first prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-03_03_B5203; source_row=19808 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c