Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18471–18480

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other10 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker with minimum qualifications

Why AAO was not persuaded

While the AAO found, contrary to the Director, that the letters did discuss the Petitioner's impact on others, the AAO concluded that the evidence as a whole did not demonstrate the Petitioner's research had achieved a degree of influence on the field as a whole.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
While the AAO found, contrary to the Director, that the letters did discuss the Petitioner's impact on others, the AAO concluded that the evidence as a whole did not demonstrate the Petitioner's research had achieved a degree of influence on the field as a whole. Citation levels were not shown to be noteworthy within the field, assertions of widespread clinical implementation were not adequately supported, and journal prestige alone did not demonstrate individual article influence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-03_03_B5203; source_row=19810
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherEngineer

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date forward

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner had negative net income and negative current assets in 2013 (the priority date year) and did not employ the Beneficiary that year. The 2014 interim financial statement was unaudited and unacceptable; earning statements cannot substitute for required evidence types; and the financial officer statement was undermined by contradictory employee-count representations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner had negative net income and negative current assets in 2013 (the priority date year) and did not employ the Beneficiary that year. The 2014 interim financial statement was unaudited and unacceptable; earning statements cannot substitute for required evidence types; and the financial officer statement was undermined by contradictory employee-count representations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=19806
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherEngineer

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets labor certification job requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The employment certificate contradicts the labor certification's claimed job titles and history, and fails to describe specific duties or confirm full-time employment, so the five-year qualifying experience requirement is not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The employment certificate contradicts the labor certification's claimed job titles and history, and fails to describe specific duties or confirm full-time employment, so the five-year qualifying experience requirement is not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=19807
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

Most materials lacked a listed author and appeared to be press releases. The one article with an author lacked a compliant translation (missing translator signature, incomplete translation, and a discrepancy with the source text). The Petitioner also failed to establish that the cited publications were professional or major trade publications or other major media.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Most materials lacked a listed author and appeared to be press releases. The one article with an author lacked a compliant translation (missing translator signature, incomplete translation, and a discrepancy with the source text). The Petitioner also failed to establish that the cited publications were professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=19802
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The awards and designations were received by the Beneficiary's employers, not the Beneficiary himself. The Petitioner also failed to sufficiently corroborate the issuance of the cited awards or designations with independent material.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The awards and designations were received by the Beneficiary's employers, not the Beneficiary himself. The Petitioner also failed to sufficiently corroborate the issuance of the cited awards or designations with independent material.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=19800
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed the Beneficiary played a leading and critical role as General Manager and as Director of Operations. However, the Petitioner failed to corroborate the assertions in letters and press releases that the hotels received notable distinctions and honors, so distinguished reputation was not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the Beneficiary played a leading and critical role as General Manager and as Director of Operations. However, the Petitioner failed to corroborate the assertions in letters and press releases that the hotels received notable distinctions and honors, so distinguished reputation was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=19803
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

The AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not support the required level of expertise.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=19805
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

commanded a high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services in relation to others in the field

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Beneficiary earned $144,516.74 in 2014, which was over 50 percent more than the 90th-percentile earnings for lodging managers per BLS and comparable data, constituting a high salary compared to others in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary earned $144,516.74 in 2014, which was over 50 percent more than the 90th-percentile earnings for lodging managers per BLS and comparable data, constituting a high salary compared to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-11-02_01_B2203; source_row=19804
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The awards lacked evidence of national or international recognition in the sport dance field. Several came from organizations the Petitioner himself led, making them indicative of institutional self-recognition rather than nationally or internationally recognized awards. A supporting letter was inconsistent with the organization's founding date and was given no evidentiary weight.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The awards lacked evidence of national or international recognition in the sport dance field. Several came from organizations the Petitioner himself led, making them indicative of institutional self-recognition rather than nationally or internationally recognized awards. A supporting letter was inconsistent with the organization's founding date and was given no evidentiary weight.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-30_01_B2203; source_row=19789
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why AAO was not persuaded

While the Petitioner performed in leading roles, there was no documentary evidence demonstrating that any of the organizations had a distinguished reputation. Program brochures, website materials, and media announcements did not set the organizations apart from others in the field. Supporting letters were undermined by internal inconsistencies and the absence of contact information.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner performed in leading roles, there was no documentary evidence demonstrating that any of the organizations had a distinguished reputation. Program brochures, website materials, and media announcements did not set the organizations apart from others in the field. Supporting letters were undermined by internal inconsistencies and the absence of contact information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-30_01_B2203; source_row=19795
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment