Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18501–18510
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's peer review was limited with no editorial board service; her publication record was modest (one article of four paragraphs, a short letter to an editor, and abstracts); her professional position was entry-level; and her contributions showed only incremental advances to the general pool of knowledge without citation evidence or trade coverage establishing national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's peer review was limited with no editorial board service; her publication record was modest (one article of four paragraphs, a short letter to an editor, and abstracts); her professional position was entry-level; and her contributions showed only incremental advances to the general pool of knowledge without citation evidence or trade coverage establishing national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=19769 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding or submit additional evidence on appeal, so the issue was abandoned. The record lacked independent journalistic or other evidence of national or international recognition for the awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding or submit additional evidence on appeal, so the issue was abandoned. The record lacked independent journalistic or other evidence of national or international recognition for the awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=19761 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding on appeal. AAO noted that even if the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role for certain research, the criterion requires a showing of such a role for organizations or establishments as a whole with a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding on appeal. AAO noted that even if the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role for certain research, the criterion requires a showing of such a role for organizations or establishments as a whole with a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=19767 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding or submit additional evidence on appeal. The record lacks evidence that the memberships are qualifying under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ii).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding or submit additional evidence on appeal. The record lacks evidence that the memberships are qualifying under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ii).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=19762 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
What the decision said
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding or submit additional evidence on appeal. The salary was not indicative of national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not challenge this finding or submit additional evidence on appeal. The salary was not indicative of national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=19768 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found that patent applications and supporting expert letters demonstrated the petitioner's inventions represent original contributions of major significance, including a search ranking method described as a radical shift from existing models and a mobile search engine described as a major upgrade to anything on the market.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that patent applications and supporting expert letters demonstrated the petitioner's inventions represent original contributions of major significance, including a search ranking method described as a radical shift from existing models and a mobile search engine described as a major upgrade to anything on the market.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_02_B2203; source_row=19776 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found the totality of evidence—original contributions, media attention, $9 million in venture capital, partnerships with prominent technology companies, and expert recognition—establishes that the petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field and has sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the totality of evidence—original contributions, media attention, $9 million in venture capital, partnerships with prominent technology companies, and expert recognition—establishes that the petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field and has sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_02_B2203; source_row=19778 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record confirms the petitioner performs a leading and critical role as founder and CEO of a company with a distinguished reputation, evidenced by significant venture capital investment and recognition of its unique product.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record confirms the petitioner performs a leading and critical role as founder and CEO of a company with a distinguished reputation, evidenced by significant venture capital investment and recognition of its unique product.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-26_02_B2203; source_row=19777 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c