Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary had only about six months of experience as a systems analyst and that experience as a computer programmer could not be substituted because Line H.10 of the labor certification expressly precluded experience in an alternate occupation. The Petitioner's J.21 response that the prior experience with the Petitioner was not substantially comparable also undermined any attempt to use that experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary had only about six months of experience as a systems analyst and that experience as a computer programmer could not be substituted because Line H.10 of the labor certification expressly precluded experience in an alternate occupation. The Petitioner's J.21 response that the prior experience with the Petitioner was not substantially comparable also undermined any attempt to use that experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-19_01_B5203; source_row=19755 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary qualifications per labor certification — advanced degree
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed that a degree from an unaccredited institution does not qualify as an advanced degree under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) because accreditation ensures a basic level of quality. The school's accreditation was revoked before the Beneficiary completed his studies and before his degree was issued. SEVP approval is irrelevant to advanced degree classification.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that a degree from an unaccredited institution does not qualify as an advanced degree under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) because accreditation ensures a basic level of quality. The school's accreditation was revoked before the Beneficiary completed his studies and before his degree was issued. SEVP approval is irrelevant to advanced degree classification. The labor certification permitted no alternate combination of education and experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-15_02_B5203; source_row=19754 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
possession of advanced degree or foreign equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed that only a single degree constituting the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate satisfies the regulatory requirement; combinations of education and experience, or multiple lesser credentials, produce only an 'equivalent' rather than a 'foreign equivalent degree.' The Beneficiary's three-year Indian degree is equivalent only to three years of U.S.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that only a single degree constituting the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate satisfies the regulatory requirement; combinations of education and experience, or multiple lesser credentials, produce only an 'equivalent' rather than a 'foreign equivalent degree.' The Beneficiary's three-year Indian degree is equivalent only to three years of U.S. undergraduate study, and no evaluation found it to be the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree on its own.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-15_01_B5203; source_row=19752 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
60 months experience in job offered and H.14 skills
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO raised this ground sua sponte. Conflicts among the labor certification, a prior labor certification, the Beneficiary's resume, and experience letters made it impossible to confirm 60 months of qualifying experience. The letters also failed to demonstrate the specific H.14 technical skills required by the labor certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO raised this ground sua sponte. Conflicts among the labor certification, a prior labor certification, the Beneficiary's resume, and experience letters made it impossible to confirm 60 months of qualifying experience. The letters also failed to demonstrate the specific H.14 technical skills required by the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-15_01_B5203; source_row=19753 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Director did not contest this prong; the Petitioner's research in synthetic chemistry with broad industrial and medical applications was implicitly treated as national in scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The Director did not contest this prong; the Petitioner's research in synthetic chemistry with broad industrial and medical applications was implicitly treated as national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-14_03_B5203; source_row=19750 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found that the Petitioner's expert letters, citation records (139 citations with above-average rates), and journal documentation together demonstrate a past history of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field of synthetic organic chemistry, establishing that he will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's expert letters, citation records (139 citations with above-average rates), and journal documentation together demonstrate a past history of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field of synthetic organic chemistry, establishing that he will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-14_03_B5203; source_row=19751 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Director did not contest this prong; AAO treated employment in synthetic organic chemistry with applications in nanotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and biomedicine as having substantial intrinsic merit.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Director did not contest this prong; AAO treated employment in synthetic organic chemistry with applications in nanotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and biomedicine as having substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-14_03_B5203; source_row=19749 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that although the Petitioner is an experienced and effective teacher, the new evidence (an unpublished abstract, post-filing evaluator/adviser activities, a 2014-2015 evaluation, and a 2002-2003 magazine committee listing) did not demonstrate influence on the field as a whole or impact beyond the institutions where she taught. Post-filing achievements could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that although the Petitioner is an experienced and effective teacher, the new evidence (an unpublished abstract, post-filing evaluator/adviser activities, a 2014-2015 evaluation, and a 2002-2003 magazine committee listing) did not demonstrate influence on the field as a whole or impact beyond the institutions where she taught. Post-filing achievements could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-14_02_B5203; source_row=19748 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's assertion that her sex-education program could have national impact was unsupported; the record showed no national framework for health curricula and no evidence that other states had adopted or expressed interest in her proposed program.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's assertion that her sex-education program could have national impact was unsupported; the record showed no national framework for health curricula and no evidence that other states had adopted or expressed interest in her proposed program.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-10-14_02_B5203; source_row=19747 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c